What Intelligence Tests Miss 在线电子书 图书标签: 心理学 思维 认知科学 思考 psychology 认知&神经&⼼理科学 阳志平 英文原版
发表于2024-12-22
What Intelligence Tests Miss 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2024
选择性看看
评分全书讲的一点:理性比智商更重要。前面一大部分讲智商测验如何如何不对感觉略学术了。后面讲理性的重要性,以及因为各种不理性导致的问题还是挺好的,有希望能看到总结性的内容。可惜,理性再重要,人就是非理性的。或许,理解与接受这一点,并在很多解决办法的设计上考虑到人的非理性,相比要求人们更理性会更好。
评分选择性看看
评分全书讲的一点:理性比智商更重要。前面一大部分讲智商测验如何如何不对感觉略学术了。后面讲理性的重要性,以及因为各种不理性导致的问题还是挺好的,有希望能看到总结性的内容。可惜,理性再重要,人就是非理性的。或许,理解与接受这一点,并在很多解决办法的设计上考虑到人的非理性,相比要求人们更理性会更好。
评分关于irrationality写得挺中规中矩的一本书,作者还是俺大学的prof!如果对irrationality有兴趣的话,建议看the upside of irrationality,写得通俗又好玩。对于已经完全知晓这一领域,例如Bayesian formula玩的易如反掌的人,要么直接忽略要么recap作者最后一章的cognitive miser架构。
Keith E. Stanovich is Emeritus Professor of Applied Psychology and Human Development at the University of Toronto and former Canada Research Chair of Applied Cognitive Science. He is the author of over 200 scientific articles and seven books. He received his BA degree in psychology from Ohio State University in 1973 and his PhD in psychology from the University of Michigan in 1977.
Critics of intelligence tests - writers such as Robert Sternberg, Howard Gardner, and Daniel Goleman - have argued in recent years that these tests neglect important qualities such as emotion, empathy, and interpersonal skills. However, such critiques imply that though intelligence tests may miss certain key noncognitive areas, they encompass most of what is important in the cognitive domain. In this book, Keith Stanovich challenges this widely held assumption. Stanovich shows that IQ tests (or their proxies, such as the SAT) are radically incomplete as measures of cognitive functioning. They fail to assess traits that most people associate with 'good thinking', skills such as judgement and decision-making. Such cognitive skills are crucial to real-world behaviour, affecting the way we plan, evaluate critical evidence, judge risks and probabilities, and make effective decisions. IQ tests fail to assess these skills of rational thought, even though they are measurable cognitive processes. Rational thought is just as important as intelligence, Stanovich argues, and it should be valued as highly as the abilities currently measured on intelligence tests.
作者把心智分为三种,没有必要,也是不恰当的。传统分法都是两种,一种自动反应,一种费心思考;前者要么被称为直觉反应,要么被称为感受反应,要么被称为感情反应,要么被称为system 1;后者要么被称为理性反应,要么被称为理智反应,要么称为system 2。 作者所谓反省心智...
评分整个疫情期间,美国总统特朗普的言论总是那么“雷人”。一会儿充满自信“没有人比我更了解新冠病毒”,一会儿又发言污蔑为“中国病毒”,几天后再改口。美国媒体四年来一天至少25小时在喷他如何如何德不配位。 中国网民干脆给他起个“川建国同志”的外号,一句“你是打入敌军内...
评分七月流火,恰逢我在生活中做了几个拖沓而失败的决定,于是读这本书极为应景。 阅读之前,我的问题很简单: > 智商高就能理性决策吗?我们该怎么理性决策? 其实这本书的副标题已经回答了前半个问题:聪明人也会做傻事。但我不只是想得到「能」或「不能」的回答,我想知道,...
评分当初看这本书的时候把它当作一部拓展视野的读物,认为会像怪诞心理学那样,有点幽默但又会教授你加个视角去看世界。但事实却完全不一样,就像书中说的那样,我们无不时刻在遵循着牛顿定理,同样我们的大脑也无不时刻在遵循着贝叶斯公式… 生活中我并算不上是个有...
What Intelligence Tests Miss 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2024