Keith E. Stanovich is Emeritus Professor of Applied Psychology and Human Development at the University of Toronto and former Canada Research Chair of Applied Cognitive Science. He is the author of over 200 scientific articles and seven books. He received his BA degree in psychology from Ohio State University in 1973 and his PhD in psychology from the University of Michigan in 1977.
Critics of intelligence tests - writers such as Robert Sternberg, Howard Gardner, and Daniel Goleman - have argued in recent years that these tests neglect important qualities such as emotion, empathy, and interpersonal skills. However, such critiques imply that though intelligence tests may miss certain key noncognitive areas, they encompass most of what is important in the cognitive domain. In this book, Keith Stanovich challenges this widely held assumption. Stanovich shows that IQ tests (or their proxies, such as the SAT) are radically incomplete as measures of cognitive functioning. They fail to assess traits that most people associate with 'good thinking', skills such as judgement and decision-making. Such cognitive skills are crucial to real-world behaviour, affecting the way we plan, evaluate critical evidence, judge risks and probabilities, and make effective decisions. IQ tests fail to assess these skills of rational thought, even though they are measurable cognitive processes. Rational thought is just as important as intelligence, Stanovich argues, and it should be valued as highly as the abilities currently measured on intelligence tests.
理性 在知识变现时代你听过最多的话便是「听过很多道理,却依然过不好一生」。那么是那里出现了问题呢?可能你根本没听过什么道理,高估了你听过的道理。也可能是你听过的道理,已经不符合这个时代的潮流。那么,在 21 世纪,哪些道理才值得我们知道呢。答案是,理性。如阳志平...
评分本书在《思考快与慢》的两个系统理论上增加了一个层面(书中引用了许多前者的实验结果,许多内容也差不多),自主心智、算法心智与反省心智。个人理解为就是直觉、智力和理性。该书用几乎一半的篇幅论证了现有智商概念的不科学,提出要将对理性的概念单独列出并单独测验,这部...
评分七月流火,恰逢我在生活中做了几个拖沓而失败的决定,于是读这本书极为应景。 阅读之前,我的问题很简单: > 智商高就能理性决策吗?我们该怎么理性决策? 其实这本书的副标题已经回答了前半个问题:聪明人也会做傻事。但我不只是想得到「能」或「不能」的回答,我想知道,...
评分七月流火,恰逢我在生活中做了几个拖沓而失败的决定,于是读这本书极为应景。 阅读之前,我的问题很简单: > 智商高就能理性决策吗?我们该怎么理性决策? 其实这本书的副标题已经回答了前半个问题:聪明人也会做傻事。但我不只是想得到「能」或「不能」的回答,我想知道,...
评分当初看这本书的时候把它当作一部拓展视野的读物,认为会像怪诞心理学那样,有点幽默但又会教授你加个视角去看世界。但事实却完全不一样,就像书中说的那样,我们无不时刻在遵循着牛顿定理,同样我们的大脑也无不时刻在遵循着贝叶斯公式… 生活中我并算不上是个有...
全书讲的一点:理性比智商更重要。前面一大部分讲智商测验如何如何不对感觉略学术了。后面讲理性的重要性,以及因为各种不理性导致的问题还是挺好的,有希望能看到总结性的内容。可惜,理性再重要,人就是非理性的。或许,理解与接受这一点,并在很多解决办法的设计上考虑到人的非理性,相比要求人们更理性会更好。
评分后半部分实在是太难啃了。。说了很多dysrationalia的内容
评分为嘛我搜到就一篇论文 求电子版 ==
评分为嘛我搜到就一篇论文 求电子版 ==
评分开始颠覆和修正一些观念 何为理性 如何习得?
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有