What Intelligence Tests Miss pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Keith E. Stanovich is Emeritus Professor of Applied Psychology and Human Development at the University of Toronto and former Canada Research Chair of Applied Cognitive Science. He is the author of over 200 scientific articles and seven books. He received his BA degree in psychology from Ohio State University in 1973 and his PhD in psychology from the University of Michigan in 1977.
- 心理學
- 思維
- 認知科學
- 思考
- psychology
- 認知&神經&⼼理科學
- 陽誌平
- 英文原版
Critics of intelligence tests - writers such as Robert Sternberg, Howard Gardner, and Daniel Goleman - have argued in recent years that these tests neglect important qualities such as emotion, empathy, and interpersonal skills. However, such critiques imply that though intelligence tests may miss certain key noncognitive areas, they encompass most of what is important in the cognitive domain. In this book, Keith Stanovich challenges this widely held assumption. Stanovich shows that IQ tests (or their proxies, such as the SAT) are radically incomplete as measures of cognitive functioning. They fail to assess traits that most people associate with 'good thinking', skills such as judgement and decision-making. Such cognitive skills are crucial to real-world behaviour, affecting the way we plan, evaluate critical evidence, judge risks and probabilities, and make effective decisions. IQ tests fail to assess these skills of rational thought, even though they are measurable cognitive processes. Rational thought is just as important as intelligence, Stanovich argues, and it should be valued as highly as the abilities currently measured on intelligence tests.
具體描述
讀後感
本书在《思考快与慢》的两个系统理论上增加了一个层面（书中引用了许多前者的实验结果，许多内容也差不多），自主心智、算法心智与反省心智。个人理解为就是直觉、智力和理性。该书用几乎一半的篇幅论证了现有智商概念的不科学，提出要将对理性的概念单独列出并单独测验，这部...
評分整个疫情期间，美国总统特朗普的言论总是那么“雷人”。一会儿充满自信“没有人比我更了解新冠病毒”，一会儿又发言污蔑为“中国病毒”，几天后再改口。美国媒体四年来一天至少25小时在喷他如何如何德不配位。 中国网民干脆给他起个“川建国同志”的外号，一句“你是打入敌军内...
評分 評分本书在《思考快与慢》的两个系统理论上增加了一个层面（书中引用了许多前者的实验结果，许多内容也差不多），自主心智、算法心智与反省心智。个人理解为就是直觉、智力和理性。该书用几乎一半的篇幅论证了现有智商概念的不科学，提出要将对理性的概念单独列出并单独测验，这部...
評分用戶評價
看看
评分把Thinking, Fast and Slow的內容包個“智商”的皮，再到處拿點成果就成書瞭，那寫書也太容易瞭吧...書中關於Daniel C. Dennett的“直覺泵”倒是不錯的指引，貝葉斯公式的應用也初露端倪。
评分全書講的一點：理性比智商更重要。前麵一大部分講智商測驗如何如何不對感覺略學術瞭。後麵講理性的重要性，以及因為各種不理性導緻的問題還是挺好的，有希望能看到總結性的內容。可惜，理性再重要，人就是非理性的。或許，理解與接受這一點，並在很多解決辦法的設計上考慮到人的非理性，相比要求人們更理性會更好。
评分為嘛我搜到就一篇論文 求電子版 ＝＝
评分後半部分實在是太難啃瞭。。說瞭很多dysrationalia的內容
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有