The narrative of the Garden of Eden infused seventeenth-century political thought no less than it reflected attitudes toward the relationship between the sexes. Within the contemporary debate over political legitimacy, theorists who supported or questioned the monarchy turned explicitly to the narrative of the Garden of Eden and Adam and Eve to articulate their theories of governmental authority. Engaging this foundational relationship between gendered interpersonal and governmental organization, Shannon Miller turns to a body of texts produced in England that replot the story of the Garden. She sets a series of writings by women into conversation with the period's most important poetic rendering of the Fall, Milton's Paradise Lost, to illustrate how significant gender was to accounts of social and political organization, and to demonstrate how the Garden narrative plots the role of gender. Her multidirectional and multilayered conversation between numerous seventeenth-century women-such as Aemilia Lanyer, Rachel Speght, Lucy Hutchinson, Margaret Cavendish, and Mary Chudleigh-and Milton's Genesis epic crystallizes the interplay between the narrative of the Fall, the organization of political structures, and the extent to which both were shaped by cultural debates over the role of women.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
感謝師兄 感謝川大圖書館。用很新曆史主義的方式比照彌爾頓和17世紀的一係列女作傢作品 共同的背景和主題能産生很多有意義的討論 但正如作者所說 無法證明彌爾頓接觸過這些作品
评分感謝師兄 感謝川大圖書館。用很新曆史主義的方式比照彌爾頓和17世紀的一係列女作傢作品 共同的背景和主題能産生很多有意義的討論 但正如作者所說 無法證明彌爾頓接觸過這些作品
评分感謝師兄 感謝川大圖書館。用很新曆史主義的方式比照彌爾頓和17世紀的一係列女作傢作品 共同的背景和主題能産生很多有意義的討論 但正如作者所說 無法證明彌爾頓接觸過這些作品
评分感謝師兄 感謝川大圖書館。用很新曆史主義的方式比照彌爾頓和17世紀的一係列女作傢作品 共同的背景和主題能産生很多有意義的討論 但正如作者所說 無法證明彌爾頓接觸過這些作品
评分感謝師兄 感謝川大圖書館。用很新曆史主義的方式比照彌爾頓和17世紀的一係列女作傢作品 共同的背景和主題能産生很多有意義的討論 但正如作者所說 無法證明彌爾頓接觸過這些作品
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有