Telemachus, or the Memoirs of an Immortal God

Telemachus, or the Memoirs of an Immortal God pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

出版者:Pozzi Pres Corp
作者:Thieblot, Robert J.
出品人:
页数:781
译者:
出版时间:1997-8
价格:31.95
装帧:Paperback
isbn号码:9780965946506
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 奇幻
  • 神话
  • 不朽
  • 冒险
  • 回忆录
  • 神祇
  • 命运
  • 自我发现
  • 史诗
  • 文学
想要找书就要到 图书目录大全
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

Telemachus comprises the memoirs of Telemachus who was born in Athens about the year 314 B.C. He is of semidivine origin, having the mortal Demetrius of Phaleron for a father and the goddess Xanthippe of Paestum for a mother.

Demetrius of Phaleron was a peripatetic philosopher, author and politician who was made governor of Athens by Cassander of Macedon in 318 B.C. Driven from power ten years later, he sought refuge in Alexandria. Telemachus was thus raised in Alexandria, something he refers to in his memoirs, but only in passing. Xanthippe of Paestum is a goddess of Magna Graecia, the Greek diaspora into southern Italy. She has to a considerable measure overcome her obscure origins by her beauty and intelligence. Zeus finds her fetching and accords her privileges she would not otherwise have. This has caused resentment in Hades, Lord of the Underworld. His antipathy extends to her son as well, whom he accuses of meddling in human (mortal) affairs. The gods know that men create gods, not gods men. They, in fact, differ little from their creators, except that they are incorporeal, and by reason of that, immortal. Their power over men is the power of illusion.

In the heaven of the immortal gods reigns Zeus (Jupiter to the Latins) who is addressed as "Patroisos" (Father). From behind a mask of affability he jealously guards his power and would be ruthless in suppressing dissent.

It was in the early Roman Empire that the gods became alarmed by the proliferation of religious ideas of a largely irrational, fantastic and redemptory nature. They feared this adulteration would extend to themselves, that mortals would imagine them in a different way, and as imagined they would be changed.

When Patroisos learned of the Emperor Commodus (A.D. 161-192) shuffling humbly behind the priests of Isis cradling in his arms the image of a monkey god, he knew the time had come to disengage. The result was the Decree of Separation, which in essence forbids immortals congress with mortals. To the extent the gods maintain a presence among mortals, it is only one of surveillance-absent exceptional circumstances. The decree has much incommoded Telemachus, who finds the heaven of the gods boring and yearns to observe the human condition.

The memoirs commence with an audience with Patroisos and end with one. The period is about a year, January 1794-January 1795. The reason for the first audience is the report of an odd occurrence in a France theretofore deemed safely Christian. Patroisos speaks of Lutetia. Telemachus knows he means Paris. What happened in Paris was the crowning of a Goddess of Reason in what had been the Cathedral of Notre Dame. Telemachus, as he learns to his delight, is to be sent to explore this dangerous phenomenon. In fact, it was just a matter of anti-Christian posturing by the atheist Hebert and his "enrages," the most extreme of French Revolutionary factions.

In this and other audiences, Patroisos and Telemachus are given to dissimulation. Patroisos pretends Telemachus finds association with mortals unpleasant and claims he much regrets the necessity of sending him forth into the real world (the world of mortals) to do this or that. When he orders him home, he thanks him profusely. Telemachus, for his part, plays upon his master's fears, exaggerates the danger to Olympian institutions posed by mortals' thoughts about the gods, and is quite prepared to concoct stories to frighten his master, to the enlargement of his liberty.

Telemachus is very aware that power corrupts. He is unabashedly republican, believing a well ordered republic best for the protection of liberty. That the gods are different from men, the created from their creators, he knows to be false. Yet, nowhere in the memoirs does he suggest that anything other than absolutism (the absolutism of Patroisos) is appropriate for the immortal gods. What constrains him is fear. That he is himself subject to institutions which accord no right to liberty may well explain his strong preference for liberty and its protections in mortal affairs.

Much of the memoirs are retrospective. While they begin and end in the French Revolution, they cover much more. "It was," as Telemachus put it, "the rebirth of learning which, as it liberated mortals, liberated me." The year was 1340 and what frightened Patroisos was garbled intelligence of the doings of Petrarch, a mortal in love with the past, with classical antiquity, possibly then also with the religion of classical antiquity, the religion of the Olympian gods. It was a fear Telemachus was to feed. Given by a frightened master an exemption from the Decree of Separation, he was to spend nearly 250 years in the real world of his delight, free to do there nearly whatever he liked. In that time he served various popes, intervened in the political affairs of Florence, studied and admired the Venetian Republic, and also studied its opposite, as it were, the tyranny of the Ottoman Turks. As a Knight Hospitaler, he would resist them on Malta and be present at Lepanto, witness to the victory there. Sent to France in the spring of 1794, he actually arrived after the death of Hebert (guillotined at the instigation of Robespierre). Conspiring with the terrorist Fouche, he set about the destruction of Robespierre and Saint-Just. Succeeding in that, he threw himself into post-Thermidorian politics, but was too soon thereafter recalled.

In the audience that ends the memoirs, Patroisos and Telemachus (typically) view the world in different ways. Patroisos is pleased, but not because the Robespierrist tyranny has come to an end. He is pleased because the end of Robespierre ended also his cult of the Supreme Being. Telemachus is very aware that this Supreme Being was but an oddity of the megalomania of Robespierre and no threat to Olympus. Yet, smiling knowingly, he does nothing to dispel the useful delusion of the Father of the Gods.

好的,以下是一份关于《Telemachus, or the Memoirs of an Immortal God》的图书简介,不包含书中内容,力求详细且自然: --- 《不朽之神的漫忆录:忒勒玛科斯》—— 一部超越时空的史诗侧影 探索人类存在的极限,品味永恒的孤独与智慧的重量。 《不朽之神的漫忆录:忒勒玛科斯》(Telemachus, or the Memoirs of an Immortal God)并非一部简单的神话再述,而是一部沉静而宏大的哲学沉思录,它以一种近乎冷峻的笔触,描绘了“永生”这一概念在个体生命中投下的漫长阴影。本书拒绝迎合大众对神祇光辉灿烂的刻板印象,转而深入探究一位存在于时间洪流之外的生命体,在无数次文明兴衰、沧海桑田之间,如何维持其心智的完整性,以及如何看待那转瞬即逝的“凡人”经验。 超越历史的视角:时间不再是衡量尺度 本书的叙事结构极为独特,它并非按照线性时间推进,而是以一系列碎片化的“印记”和“回响”构建而成。读者将被引导进入一个由无数个时代碎片拼接而成的意识迷宫。忒勒玛科斯,这位被赋予了永恒生命的个体,其记忆库中储存着从文明的曙光到现代的每一次重大转折的细微感知。他目睹了巴比伦的沙尘如何掩埋宏伟的塔尖,目睹了亚历山大的征途如何最终汇入无声的遗忘,也目睹了那些短暂而炽热的爱恋如何如流星般划过夜空,最终归于寂灭。 这本书的魅力在于,它拒绝提供一个全知全能的上帝视角。忒勒玛科斯的视角是独特的,他既是观察者,也是无法真正融入的局外人。他所记录的,不是宏大的战争编年史,而是那些在历史巨轮碾过时幸存下来的微小细节——一首失传的挽歌的韵律,一座被遗忘的祭坛上苔藓的颜色,一个濒死哲学家在黄昏时留下的最后一句箴言。这些片段共同构建了一种对“存在”的深刻拷问:当一切都将消逝,唯有你独自留下时,事物的价值何在? 孤独的重量与智慧的代价 永生并非恩赐,而是一种沉重的负担。本书细腻地剖析了忒勒玛科斯在漫长岁月中对“失去”的适应过程。早期的他,或许像任何年轻的生命一样,对世间万物充满热情,试图参与和改变;然而,数千年过去,他学会了抽离。每一段深厚的情感联结,都预示着未来必然的、难以承受的告别。他目睹了挚友的衰老、信徒的背叛、理想的腐朽,每一次“告别”都在他心智的深处刻下新的纹路。 这种永恒的疏离感,迫使忒勒玛科斯发展出一种近乎冷酷的、纯粹的智性生存方式。他不再追逐世俗的权力和欲望,而是将自己的全部精力投入到对“真理”的探寻中。书中的章节常以对某种哲学思辨的阐述开始或结束,这些思辨并非晦涩难懂的学院派论述,而是从亲历历史中提炼出的、带着人间烟火气的洞察。他思考着:秩序与混乱的边界在哪里?美与丑的相对性如何随时代而变幻?时间本身是否只是一种错觉? 文体与氛围:一曲低沉的挽歌 《忒勒玛科斯》的写作风格是其核心价值之一。它模仿了某种古典的、近乎拉丁语散文的庄重感,但又不失现代语法的精确性。文字如同一块经过千年打磨的玉石,表面温润,内里却沉淀着无法穿透的密度。叙事节奏时而缓慢得如同冰川移动,让读者有时间去体会每一个词语背后的沧桑;时而又因一个突然浮现的强烈情感冲击而陡然加速,展现出永生者内心深处尚未完全熄灭的火花。 本书的基调是内敛的、略带忧郁的,如同在月光下独自阅读一本泛黄的古籍。它不是一本提供简单答案的读物,而是一面映照读者内心对“时间、爱、意义”这些终极命题的镜子。通过忒勒玛科斯无可比拟的生命长度,读者得以从一个全新的、宏大的维度重新审视自己的短暂而珍贵的生命轨迹。 适合的读者 本书献给所有对人类文明的深度、哲学的恒久性,以及存在主义的困境抱有强烈好奇心的读者。如果您着迷于那些跨越时代的伟大思想,欣赏那些文字蕴含的复杂层次和丰富内涵,并愿意投入时间去品味一段关于“不朽”的沉静独白,那么《忒勒玛科斯》将是一场不容错过的精神旅程。它不是让你逃离现实的奇幻故事,而是让你以更深刻的眼光回归现实的史诗侧影。 ---

作者简介

目录信息

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有