Fred Beiser, renowned as one of the world's leading historians of German philosophy, presents a brilliant new study of Friedrich von Schiller (1759-1805), rehabilitating him as a philosopher worthy of serious attention. Beiser shows, in particular, that Schiller's engagement with Kant is far more subtle and rewarding than is often portrayed. Promising to be a landmark in the study of German thought, Schiller as Philosopher will be compulsory reading for any philosopher, historian, or literary scholar engaged with the key developments of this fertile period.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
Deeply unsatisfying. Beiser writes much about the most sublime minds, yet somehow constantly fails his readers with pedantry and conformism, both of which sadly betray the spirit of his books' protagonists.
评分非常无聊。不过是把席勒放在现代的一套学术评价话语系统里筛了一遍。最令人无语的是他居然认为席勒对谢林黑格尔的影响仅在于提出了“客观的美”这样的口号，虽然席勒确实论证失败了，但原因不在于保留二元论，而应该是他没有在哲学上证明二元论的合理性，更没有看到二元论和浪漫派的自由是现代人不可逃避的命运。但他其实在《华伦斯坦》里就证明了这一点
评分Deeply unsatisfying. Beiser writes much about the most sublime minds, yet somehow constantly fails his readers with pedantry and conformism, both of which sadly betray the spirit of his books' protagonists.
评分非常无聊。不过是把席勒放在现代的一套学术评价话语系统里筛了一遍。最令人无语的是他居然认为席勒对谢林黑格尔的影响仅在于提出了“客观的美”这样的口号，虽然席勒确实论证失败了，但原因不在于保留二元论，而应该是他没有在哲学上证明二元论的合理性，更没有看到二元论和浪漫派的自由是现代人不可逃避的命运。但他其实在《华伦斯坦》里就证明了这一点
评分Deeply unsatisfying. Beiser writes much about the most sublime minds, yet somehow constantly fails his readers with pedantry and conformism, both of which sadly betray the spirit of his books' protagonists.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有