The Constitution of Agency 在线电子书 图书标签: 伦理学 Korsgaard 政治哲学 哲学 心理学 分析哲学 reason practical-identity
发表于2024-11-21
The Constitution of Agency 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2024
第一部分:休谟区分冷静的激情与冷静的理性的运作,等同个人真实愿望与个人总体善/目的是自然主义谬误,重视[日常]心理学语言的规范性用法,休谟不行,要像康德区分desire/volition,理性事关意志遵从独立于意志的理由,做人就要行动要走就得先迈脚于是工具原则是意志的构成性规范,理性以立法形式决定按倾向行动否,事物未达其内在标准是为defective,推及理想国中对城邦德性的理解;第二:亚里士多德形式/质料本体论+目的论+作为完美灵魂之德性了解一下,与康德区别于心理学层面,reason是有意识于自己动机的恰切性,action具身化其reason;第三:…注意休谟理论中一般视角、爱、人的规范性意蕴(!),伦理学的非-/认知主义区分不行 。较直接关注核心问题、略多依赖经典、清晰易懂但可能不讨巧
评分第一部分:休谟区分冷静的激情与冷静的理性的运作,等同个人真实愿望与个人总体善/目的是自然主义谬误,重视[日常]心理学语言的规范性用法,休谟不行,要像康德区分desire/volition,理性事关意志遵从独立于意志的理由,做人就要行动要走就得先迈脚于是工具原则是意志的构成性规范,理性以立法形式决定按倾向行动否,事物未达其内在标准是为defective,推及理想国中对城邦德性的理解;第二:亚里士多德形式/质料本体论+目的论+作为完美灵魂之德性了解一下,与康德区别于心理学层面,reason是有意识于自己动机的恰切性,action具身化其reason;第三:…注意休谟理论中一般视角、爱、人的规范性意蕴(!),伦理学的非-/认知主义区分不行 。较直接关注核心问题、略多依赖经典、清晰易懂但可能不讨巧
评分为什么我读第二章讨论讨论亚里士多德目的论的部分,总是读出浓厚的理学味道?
评分为什么我读第二章讨论讨论亚里士多德目的论的部分,总是读出浓厚的理学味道?
评分第一部分:休谟区分冷静的激情与冷静的理性的运作,等同个人真实愿望与个人总体善/目的是自然主义谬误,重视[日常]心理学语言的规范性用法,休谟不行,要像康德区分desire/volition,理性事关意志遵从独立于意志的理由,做人就要行动要走就得先迈脚于是工具原则是意志的构成性规范,理性以立法形式决定按倾向行动否,事物未达其内在标准是为defective,推及理想国中对城邦德性的理解;第二:亚里士多德形式/质料本体论+目的论+作为完美灵魂之德性了解一下,与康德区别于心理学层面,reason是有意识于自己动机的恰切性,action具身化其reason;第三:…注意休谟理论中一般视角、爱、人的规范性意蕴(!),伦理学的非-/认知主义区分不行 。较直接关注核心问题、略多依赖经典、清晰易懂但可能不讨巧
Christine M. Korsgaard is one of today's leading moral philosophers: this volume collects ten influential papers by her on practical reason and moral psychology. Korsgaard draws on the work of important figures in the history of philosophy such as Plato, Aristotle, Kant, and Hume, showing how their ideas can inform the solution of contemporary and traditional philosophical problems, such as the foundations of morality and practical reason, the nature of agency, and the role of the emotions in action. In Part 1, The Principles of Practical Reason , Korsgaard defends the view that the principles of practical reason are constitutive principles of action. By governing our actions in accordance with Kant's categorical imperative and the principle of instrumental reason, she argues, we take control of our own movements and so render ourselves active, self-determining beings.She criticizes rival attempts to give a normative foundation to the principles of practical reason, challenges the claims of the principle of maximizing one's own interests to be a rational principle, and argues for some deep continuities between Plato's account of the connection between justice and agency and Kant's account of the connection between autonomy and agency. In Part II, Moral Virtue and Moral Psychology , Korsgaard takes up the question of the role of our more passive or receptive faculties - our emotions and responses - in constituting our agency. She sketches a reading of the Nicomachean Ethics , based on the idea that our emotions can serve as perceptions of good and evil, and argues that this view of the emotions is at the root of the apparent differences between Aristotle and Kant's accounts of morality. She argues that in fact, Aristotle and Kant share a distinctive view about the locus of moral value and the nature of human choice that, among other things, gives them account of what it means to act rationally that is superior to other accounts.In Part III, Other Reflections , Korsgaard takes up question how we come to view one another as moral agents in Hume's philosophy. She examines the possible clash between the agency of the state and that of the individual that led to Kant's paradoxical views about revolution. And finally, she discusses her methodology in an account of what it means to be a constructivist moral philosopher. The essays are united by an introduction in which Korsgaard explains their connections to each other and to her current work.
评分
评分
评分
评分
The Constitution of Agency 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2024