If only today’s technology were simpler! It’s the universal lament, but it’s wrong. We don't want simplicity. Simple tools are not up to the task. The world is complex; our tools need to match that complexity.
Simplicity turns out to be more complex than we thought. In this provocative and informative book, Don Norman writes that the complexity of our technology must mirror the complexity and richness of our lives. It’s not complexity that’s the problem, it’s bad design. Bad design complicates things unnecessarily and confuses us. Good design can tame complexity.
Norman gives us a crash course in the virtues of complexity. But even such simple things as salt and pepper shakers, doors, and light switches become complicated when we have to deal with many of them, each somewhat different. Managing complexity, says Norman, is a partnership. Designers have to produce things that tame complexity. But we too have to do our part: we have to take the time to learn the structure and practice the skills. This is how we mastered reading and writing, driving a car, and playing sports, and this is how we can master our complex tools.
Complexity is good. Simplicity is misleading. The good life is complex, rich, and rewarding—but only if it is understandable, sensible, and meaningful.
Business Week has named Don Norman as one of the world's most influential designers. He has been both a professor and an executive: he was Vice President of Advanced Technology at Apple; his company, the Nielsen Norman Group, helps companies produce human-centered products and services; he has been on the faculty at Harvard, the University of California, San Diego, Northwestern University, and KAIST, in South Korea. He is the author of many books, including The Design of Everyday Things, The Invisible Computer (MIT Press, 1998), Emotional Design, and The Design of Future Things.
其实没啥好说的,本书没有上两本书振聋发聩。要么就是我太浅薄不能理解其中之深奥。 没有一个明晰的脉络,大概因为这个话题本身太复杂,会扯到哲学层面上太多,诺老一向深入浅出,没有挖掘下去,整篇看完给我的感觉就是“人类需求是复杂的,因为世界是复杂的。所以技术和设计...
評分如果你在寻找一套网站设计理论书籍,那么就把诺曼的设计系列丛书买齐好了。这是不二的选择。 看living with complexity会有巨大的实际好处,当你不知道如何处理上司的指令时,比如要简洁? 要这个功能那个功能?诺曼会这么告诉他~ “人们在复杂程度上有一个偏好范围,太简单...
評分其实没啥好说的,本书没有上两本书振聋发聩。要么就是我太浅薄不能理解其中之深奥。 没有一个明晰的脉络,大概因为这个话题本身太复杂,会扯到哲学层面上太多,诺老一向深入浅出,没有挖掘下去,整篇看完给我的感觉就是“人类需求是复杂的,因为世界是复杂的。所以技术和设计...
評分我没有看过《设计心理学》和《设计心理学3:情感设计》,这本2是随便挑的。读起来不累,只是有点絮絮叨叨,信息量不够大。还有这本书有一个比较别扭的地方,很多内容中引用的图片总是放在下一页。结果让人不知道是应该坚持看完这一页的内容呢,还是应该先去下一页看图再翻回来...
評分Norman後來的書越寫越囉嗦起來瞭。
评分···英文真的是羞射難懂的···
评分“An affordance is a relationship: it speaks to the possible actions a person can perform upon an object. ”
评分帶著問題讀覺得很有啓發,寫得很淺,不過角度和道理很受用
评分U should be bloody smart.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有