In this comparative-historical analysis of Spanish America, Mahoney offers a new theory of colonialism and postcolonial development. He explores why certain kinds of societies are subject to certain kinds of colonialism and why these forms of colonialism give rise to countries with differing levels of economic prosperity and social well-being. Mahoney contends that differences in the extent of colonialism are best explained by the potentially evolving fit between the institutions of the colonizing nation and those of the colonized society. Moreover, he shows how institutions forged under colonialism bring countries to relative levels of development that may prove remarkably enduring in the postcolonial period. The argument is sure to stir discussion and debate, both among experts on Spanish America who believe that development is not tightly bound by the colonial past, and among scholars of colonialism who suggest that the institutional identity of the colonizing nation is of little consequence.
James Mahoney contributes to the protracted debate of the effects of colonialism by providing a historical-institutional view of colonialism and post-colonial develpment. Mahoney provided a more complex categorization of colonial policies and institutions, ...
評分James Mahoney contributes to the protracted debate of the effects of colonialism by providing a historical-institutional view of colonialism and post-colonial develpment. Mahoney provided a more complex categorization of colonial policies and institutions, ...
評分James Mahoney contributes to the protracted debate of the effects of colonialism by providing a historical-institutional view of colonialism and post-colonial develpment. Mahoney provided a more complex categorization of colonial policies and institutions, ...
評分James Mahoney contributes to the protracted debate of the effects of colonialism by providing a historical-institutional view of colonialism and post-colonial develpment. Mahoney provided a more complex categorization of colonial policies and institutions, ...
評分James Mahoney contributes to the protracted debate of the effects of colonialism by providing a historical-institutional view of colonialism and post-colonial develpment. Mahoney provided a more complex categorization of colonial policies and institutions, ...
不但殖民可以是好的,自由主義的殖民是更好的。比較政治學者不考慮規範性問題,而是一味將責任推脫給政治理論學者,得齣的結論就是這麼充滿意識形態偏見。
评分比較曆史分析的大作,殖民主義的遺産
评分不但殖民可以是好的,自由主義的殖民是更好的。比較政治學者不考慮規範性問題,而是一味將責任推脫給政治理論學者,得齣的結論就是這麼充滿意識形態偏見。
评分帶勁
评分帶勁
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有