This book challenges historians to come to terms with the distortions that they systematically introduce into their work by their reliance on what has been written on paper without looking at what was and was not written on the body. This book is concerned with the ways in which texts relating to classical Greece, and in particular to classical Athens, classified people and with the extent to which those classifications could be seen by the eye. It compares the qualities distinguished in texts to those distinguished in sculpture and painted pottery, and emphasises the frequent invisibility of the categories upon which historians have laid most stress - the citizen, the free person, the foreigner, even the god. The frequent impossibility of seeing who belonged to which category has major political, social and theological implications which are explored here, as well as potentially revolutionary implications for all future historical writing.
评分
评分
评分
评分
自己读的关于古典学的第一本书 写的第一篇书评 从此和Osborne结缘 有些难读 intro非常重要 justify了Osborne的所有选择 带入了很多常识
评分读了第一章,后面草草翻过。感觉作者提出了很好的问题,但后面的处理没有特别好地针对这个问题来写,有些论断显得武断。不过,确实有很多值得思考的东西。
评分自己读的关于古典学的第一本书 写的第一篇书评 从此和Osborne结缘 有些难读 intro非常重要 justify了Osborne的所有选择 带入了很多常识
评分自己读的关于古典学的第一本书 写的第一篇书评 从此和Osborne结缘 有些难读 intro非常重要 justify了Osborne的所有选择 带入了很多常识
评分读了第一章,后面草草翻过。感觉作者提出了很好的问题,但后面的处理没有特别好地针对这个问题来写,有些论断显得武断。不过,确实有很多值得思考的东西。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有