And, in all sincerity, can anything more than the absence of plunder be required of the law? Can the law -- which necessarily requires the use of force -- rationally be used for anything except protecting the rights of everyone? I defy anyone to extend it beyond this purpose without perverting it and, consequently, turning might against right.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
本书反对communism，提倡liberty，作者认为law本身就是justice，而法律的意义在于防止不正当行为的蔓延，而非提倡正当行为本身。因为communism就是在强调什么是justice，从而扼杀了liberty，从而导致了社会主义的强权政治和社会的强烈同化，在作者看来起码违背了人类对自由的向往。
评分本书反对communism，提倡liberty，作者认为law本身就是justice，而法律的意义在于防止不正当行为的蔓延，而非提倡正当行为本身。因为communism就是在强调什么是justice，从而扼杀了liberty，从而导致了社会主义的强权政治和社会的强烈同化，在作者看来起码违背了人类对自由的向往。
评分If people are as incapable, as immoral, and as ignorant as the politicians indicate, then why is the right of these same people to vote defended with such passionate insistence?.....#SocialistsFearAllLiberties
评分If people are as incapable, as immoral, and as ignorant as the politicians indicate, then why is the right of these same people to vote defended with such passionate insistence?.....#SocialistsFearAllLiberties
评分If people are as incapable, as immoral, and as ignorant as the politicians indicate, then why is the right of these same people to vote defended with such passionate insistence?.....#SocialistsFearAllLiberties
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有