Who is to say how things really were? In formulating a modern answer to the question 'What is History?' Professor Carr shows that the 'facts' of history are simply those which historians have selected for scrutiny. Millions have crossed the Rubicon, but the historians tell us that only Caesar's crossing was significant. All historical facts come to us as a result of interpretative choices by historians influenced by the standards of their age. Yet if absolute objectivity is impossible, the role of the historian need in no way suffer; nor does history lose its fascination. This edition includes new material which presents the major conclusions of Professor Carr's notes for the second edition and a new preface by the author, in which he calls for 'a saner and more balanced outlook on the future'.
E.H.Carr的名著,所谓历史就是过去与现在的对话,即出自本书。 看着很过瘾,颠覆我的很多历史观,没有客观的史实,动态的历史观,历史的科学性。但也让人陷入迷思,颠覆了的,觉得没有新的观念被树立,于是陷入对历史观的真空期,知道什么是错的,却不明了什么才是对的。行文...
评分打卡:卡尔《历史是什么》 作者卡尔(1892-1982)曾是一名英国外交官,后在大学任教,对俄国历史较有研究。 本书分六个章节阐述作者的历史观。 第一历史学家和历史学家的事实。作者阐述历史事实不等于过去的事实,有历史意义的事实才被历史学家挑选出来编纂成历史事实。比如,凯...
评分The Historian and His Facts What is history?' is that it is a continuous process of interaction between the historian and his facts, an unending dialogue between the present and the past. Individual and Society History, Science, and Morality What distinguis...
由浅及深。前两讲关于facts, society, and individual的不少论点放今天算是基本共识,第三讲把history&science&morality的关系对比总结得各种犀利,第四讲causation和第五讲progress帮助理清了不少(作为determinist的)我思考甚久的问题,最后第六讲直接看着看着就懵逼跪了。。希望明年这会儿可以站着看完!PS.因为被分到了Wolfson所以看到书中时不时拿Berlin举反例的感觉真是微妙2333333
评分由浅及深。前两讲关于facts, society, and individual的不少论点放今天算是基本共识,第三讲把history&science&morality的关系对比总结得各种犀利,第四讲causation和第五讲progress帮助理清了不少(作为determinist的)我思考甚久的问题,最后第六讲直接看着看着就懵逼跪了。。希望明年这会儿可以站着看完!PS.因为被分到了Wolfson所以看到书中时不时拿Berlin举反例的感觉真是微妙2333333
评分由浅及深。前两讲关于facts, society, and individual的不少论点放今天算是基本共识,第三讲把history&science&morality的关系对比总结得各种犀利,第四讲causation和第五讲progress帮助理清了不少(作为determinist的)我思考甚久的问题,最后第六讲直接看着看着就懵逼跪了。。希望明年这会儿可以站着看完!PS.因为被分到了Wolfson所以看到书中时不时拿Berlin举反例的感觉真是微妙2333333
评分由浅及深。前两讲关于facts, society, and individual的不少论点放今天算是基本共识,第三讲把history&science&morality的关系对比总结得各种犀利,第四讲causation和第五讲progress帮助理清了不少(作为determinist的)我思考甚久的问题,最后第六讲直接看着看着就懵逼跪了。。希望明年这会儿可以站着看完!PS.因为被分到了Wolfson所以看到书中时不时拿Berlin举反例的感觉真是微妙2333333
评分由浅及深。前两讲关于facts, society, and individual的不少论点放今天算是基本共识,第三讲把history&science&morality的关系对比总结得各种犀利,第四讲causation和第五讲progress帮助理清了不少(作为determinist的)我思考甚久的问题,最后第六讲直接看着看着就懵逼跪了。。希望明年这会儿可以站着看完!PS.因为被分到了Wolfson所以看到书中时不时拿Berlin举反例的感觉真是微妙2333333
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有