In What Counts, Elena Herburger considers the effects of focus on interpretation. She investigates how focus affects the pragmatics and truth conditions of a sentence by rearranging its quantificational structure.Adopting a neo-Davidsonian stance, Herburger claims that various pragmatic and truth-conditional effects of focus sustain a uniform explanation if focus is viewed as imposing structure on otherwise unrestricted quantification. Phenomena discussed include "free" focus, the interaction between focus and negation, the quantificational structure of adverbs of quantification, the semantics of only and even, and the differences between weak and strong determiners.One of Herburger's aims is to show that a simple semantics, without reliance on such notions as semantic presupposition, can account for the truth-conditional and pragmatic effects of focus. The book will be of interest to anyone exploring the syntax-semantics interface and current theories of quantification.Linguistic Inquiry Monograph No. 36
评分
评分
评分
评分
作者不將 focus 看作是一個語用現象,而是將它和 quantifier scope 在 structured Davidson decomposition 中具體聯繫,試圖從語意學層面解釋 focus 對句意的影響。對 monotone decreasing quantifier 和 NPI 的分析算是亮點。
评分作者不將 focus 看作是一個語用現象,而是將它和 quantifier scope 在 structured Davidson decomposition 中具體聯繫,試圖從語意學層面解釋 focus 對句意的影響。對 monotone decreasing quantifier 和 NPI 的分析算是亮點。
评分作者不將 focus 看作是一個語用現象,而是將它和 quantifier scope 在 structured Davidson decomposition 中具體聯繫,試圖從語意學層面解釋 focus 對句意的影響。對 monotone decreasing quantifier 和 NPI 的分析算是亮點。
评分作者不將 focus 看作是一個語用現象,而是將它和 quantifier scope 在 structured Davidson decomposition 中具體聯繫,試圖從語意學層面解釋 focus 對句意的影響。對 monotone decreasing quantifier 和 NPI 的分析算是亮點。
评分作者不將 focus 看作是一個語用現象,而是將它和 quantifier scope 在 structured Davidson decomposition 中具體聯繫,試圖從語意學層面解釋 focus 對句意的影響。對 monotone decreasing quantifier 和 NPI 的分析算是亮點。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有