There has recently been a good deal of discussion of reasons in the philosophical literature, much of it motivated by the idea that the concept of a reason is basic to the normative realm, a fundamental concept in terms of which other normative notions can be analyzed. In this volume, John Horty brings to bear his work in logic to present a framework that allows for answers to key questions about reasons and reasoning, namely: What are reasons, and how do they support actions or conclusions? Given a collection of individual reasons, possibly suggesting conflicting actions or conclusions, how can we determine which course of action, or which conclusion, is supported by the collection as a whole? What is the mechanism of support? This book joins an important and active literature, but it also occupies a unique position. Most of the current work on reasons is concerned with a number of complex philosophical issues, such as, for example, the relation between reasons and motivation, desires, and values, the issue of internalism versus externalism in the theory of reasons, and the issue of objectivity versus subjectivity of reasons. Horty's book, by contrast, concentrates on developing a concrete theory of the way in which reasons might interact to support their outcomes. He brings to the study of reasons and their outcomes the same standards of rigor that Frege first applied in studying the relation between ordinary logical premises and their conclusions.
具體描述
讀後感
以形式化工具研究常识推理的一部有启发性的著作。作者对“理由”（reason）以及“理由”在我们日常思考中的作用进行了深入的探讨。难能可贵的是作者非常注意从直观图景出发一步步建立相关概念和理论，因而只要对逻辑、集合论等内容略有了解，此书应具有较好的可读性（书中大部...
評分以形式化工具研究常识推理的一部有启发性的著作。作者对“理由”（reason）以及“理由”在我们日常思考中的作用进行了深入的探讨。难能可贵的是作者非常注意从直观图景出发一步步建立相关概念和理论，因而只要对逻辑、集合论等内容略有了解，此书应具有较好的可读性（书中大部...
評分以形式化工具研究常识推理的一部有启发性的著作。作者对“理由”（reason）以及“理由”在我们日常思考中的作用进行了深入的探讨。难能可贵的是作者非常注意从直观图景出发一步步建立相关概念和理论，因而只要对逻辑、集合论等内容略有了解，此书应具有较好的可读性（书中大部...
評分以形式化工具研究常识推理的一部有启发性的著作。作者对“理由”（reason）以及“理由”在我们日常思考中的作用进行了深入的探讨。难能可贵的是作者非常注意从直观图景出发一步步建立相关概念和理论，因而只要对逻辑、集合论等内容略有了解，此书应具有较好的可读性（书中大部...
評分以形式化工具研究常识推理的一部有启发性的著作。作者对“理由”（reason）以及“理由”在我们日常思考中的作用进行了深入的探讨。难能可贵的是作者非常注意从直观图景出发一步步建立相关概念和理论，因而只要对逻辑、集合论等内容略有了解，此书应具有较好的可读性（书中大部...
用戶評價
e; conflict-tolerating default (deontic) logic as prioritization, instead of aggregation, from the view of moderate particularism. Shouldn't object to aggregation; can have two-step process---aggregate first, then prioritize.
评分e; conflict-tolerating default (deontic) logic as prioritization, instead of aggregation, from the view of moderate particularism. Shouldn't object to aggregation; can have two-step process---aggregate first, then prioritize.
评分e; conflict-tolerating default (deontic) logic as prioritization, instead of aggregation, from the view of moderate particularism. Shouldn't object to aggregation; can have two-step process---aggregate first, then prioritize.
评分e; conflict-tolerating default (deontic) logic as prioritization, instead of aggregation, from the view of moderate particularism. Shouldn't object to aggregation; can have two-step process---aggregate first, then prioritize.
评分e; conflict-tolerating default (deontic) logic as prioritization, instead of aggregation, from the view of moderate particularism. Shouldn't object to aggregation; can have two-step process---aggregate first, then prioritize.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有