柏拉图(公元前427年-347年)是古希腊的大哲学家,苏格拉底(公元前469年-399)的学生,亚里士多德(公元前384年-322年)的老师。他一生大部分时间居住在古希腊民族文化中心的雅典。他热爱祖国,热爱哲学。他的最高理想,哲学家应为政治家,政治家应为哲学家。哲学家不是躲在象牙塔里的书呆,应该学以致用,求诸实践。有哲学头脑的人,要有政权,有政权的人,要有哲学头脑。
这篇导读写给大学本科生、对《理想国》好奇的普通读者。参考了吴增定老师《[我怎么教学生读〈理想国〉]》。我的视野有限,没能覆盖《理想国》涉及的所有问题。欢迎有经验的读者提出建议。 为什么想读《理想国》?[张泰苏老师回忆自己的读书经历]: 我以前那会儿也思考历史、哲...
评分这是篇读书笔记,为什么读了这本书?可能起源于内心一些完美主义的东西。 这一年,给自己列了个很长的书单,想把西方经典里和科学有关的东西全读一遍,弄清楚" 科学"这个概念在西方是怎么发展到现在的,以更好的了解什么是科幻。 西方最早没有科学的概念,科学是...
评分《理想国》是古希腊伟大的哲学家柏拉图的代表作,在这本流传千古的名著中,柏拉图通过自己严密的逻辑思考和精彩的论证为我们呈现了一个“或许在天上建有它的原型”的理想城邦的全貌。书中涉及政治、教育、哲学、道德等多方面的内容,在西方哲学史上占有极其崇高和重要的地位。...
评分一、简析“洞穴比喻”的含义 如果说《理想国》是一部关于哲学的戏剧,那么以“洞穴比喻”为核心的三大比喻可谓是这部戏剧的高潮和精华所在。 洞穴比喻主要描述了这样一个故事:有一个洞穴式的地下室,它通过一条长而斜的通道与外界相连,有一些人从小就住在这里,他们头颈和...
评分对话的缘起 这一天,苏格拉底来到了一个港口城市,注意,这里并不是雅典,而是雅典“下面”的一个城市,叫比雷埃夫思港。也就是说,苏格拉底不在他的主场作战。为什么他去哪里?因为那里在过一个节日,并且是当地人第一次过这个节日,于是苏格拉底就去看热闹。他带了一个人,...
4.5 文化差异:iSocrates' metaphors go quite different than my prediction as a chinese reader. eg. the pain, pleasure and the middle stage or the heaven, earth and below earth while Plato assume that the middle ground is just the inability of the ultimate pleasure, I would definitely go for the middle ground which is what Chinese Mentality would advocat
评分4.5 文化差异:iSocrates' metaphors go quite different than my prediction as a chinese reader. eg. the pain, pleasure and the middle stage or the heaven, earth and below earth while Plato assume that the middle ground is just the inability of the ultimate pleasure, I would definitely go for the middle ground which is what Chinese Mentality would advocat
评分4.5 文化差异:iSocrates' metaphors go quite different than my prediction as a chinese reader. eg. the pain, pleasure and the middle stage or the heaven, earth and below earth while Plato assume that the middle ground is just the inability of the ultimate pleasure, I would definitely go for the middle ground which is what Chinese Mentality would advocat
评分4.5 文化差异:iSocrates' metaphors go quite different than my prediction as a chinese reader. eg. the pain, pleasure and the middle stage or the heaven, earth and below earth while Plato assume that the middle ground is just the inability of the ultimate pleasure, I would definitely go for the middle ground which is what Chinese Mentality would advocat
评分4.5 文化差异:iSocrates' metaphors go quite different than my prediction as a chinese reader. eg. the pain, pleasure and the middle stage or the heaven, earth and below earth while Plato assume that the middle ground is just the inability of the ultimate pleasure, I would definitely go for the middle ground which is what Chinese Mentality would advocat
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有