Roland Barthes (November 12, 1915 – March 25, 1980) was a French literary critic, literary and social theorist, philosopher and semiotician.
"[Mythologies] illustrates the beautiful generosity of Barthes's progressive interest in the meaning (his word is signification) of practically everything around him, not only the books and paintings of high art, but also the slogans, trivia, toys, food, and popular rituals (cruises, striptease, eating, wrestling matches) of contemporary life . . . For Barthes, words and objects have in common the organized capacity to say something; at the same time, since they are signs, words and objects have the bad faith always to appear natural to their consumer, as if what they say is eternal, true, necessary, instead of arbitrary, made, contingent. Mythologies finds Barthes revealing the fashioned systems of ideas that make it possible, for example, for 'Einstein's brain' to stand for, be the myth of, 'a genius so lacking in magic that one speaks about his thought as a functional labor analogous to the mechanical making of sausages.' Each of the little essays in this book wrenches a definition out of a common but constructed object, making the object speak its hidden, but ever-so-present, reservoir of manufactured sense."--Edward W. Said
This text refers to the Paperback edition.
在《神话修辞术》中,罗兰·巴特通过分析日常生活中的各种物品、现象和事件,勾勒出其背后资产阶级意识形态的地图。当他把目光投射到性别领域的时候,他对杂志中呈现的女作家形象产生了兴趣,写出了《小说与孩子》这篇具有女权主义色彩的文章。巴特未曾系统地论述过他的女权主...
评分罗兰·巴特的神话学充满了奇想色彩。这种感觉在科塔萨尔那些充满神经质的短篇小说以及莎士比亚那部“豆花、蛛网、芥子”都陷入狂欢的喜剧《仲夏夜之梦》中也能找到。巴特也许并不想创立某种垂范于世的理论模型,毕竟“尔曹身与名俱灭”,他要的,更接近于在疯狂的智力游戏中,...
评分【按】看了些解读巴特的文字,觉得这篇简单的解读文字也有必要贴出来,供大家批判。兼听则明。 该文收于:《文化与诗学》,第13卷,北京大学出版社,2011年版。 “神话学”:符号学分析与意识形态批判 ‘Mythology’: Semiological Analysis and Ideological Critique 摘...
评分 评分我们发明了语言,有了文字,产生了文明,摆脱了茹毛饮血,摆脱了地心引力,却永远也摆脱不了语言和话语的控制。语言和话语,就像是西西弗斯每天所推得巨石一般,每当我们以为自己的智慧足以使我们摆脱结构的枷锁,却往往发现我们对于智慧的自尊就像巨石般从山顶滚落,却又是那...
Myth Today. The signifier of myth at first has a sensory reality with its richness in it. When it becomes form, it empties itself and calls for a signification to refill it. As a second-order semiological system and depoliticized speech, myth not only distorts and naturalizes the concept, but also simplifies human acts and generates metalanguage.
评分天啦赞!!!
评分写论文时套用了一个leftwing myth的框架⋯⋯其实读巴特最挫败的地方就在于每当你有那么一点点小灵感小激情小想法,结果你发现他全都写过了说过了玩过了
评分英文本,读到第三遍基本通了……意思不太难,但是语言好绕!
评分平裝本。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有