Reassembling the Social is a fundamental challenge from one of the world's leading social theorists to how we understand society and the 'social'. Bruno Latour's contention is that the word 'social' as used by Social Scientists has become laden with assumptions to the point where it has become a misnomer. When the adjective is applied to a phenomenon, it is used to indicate a stabilized state of affairs, a bundle of ties that in due course may be used to account for another phenomenon. Latour also finds the word used as if it described a type of material, in a comparable way to an adjective such as 'wooden' or 'steely'. Rather than simply indicating what is already assembled together, it is now used in a way that makes assumptions about the nature of what is assembled. It has become a word that designates two distinct things: a process of assembling: and a type of material, distinct from others. Latour shows why 'the social' cannot be thought of as a kind of material or domain, and disputes attempts to provide a 'social explanation' of other states of affairs. While these attempts have been productive (and probably necessary) in the past, the very success of the social sciences mean that they are largely no longer so. At the present stage it is no longer possible to inspect the precise constituents entering the social domain. Latour returns to the original meaning of 'the social' to redefine the notion and allow it to trace connections again. It will then be possible to resume the traditional goal of the social sciences, but using more refined tools. Drawing on his extensive work examining the 'assemblages' of nature, Latour finds it necessary to scrutinize thoroughly the exact content of what is assembled under the umbrella of Society. This approach, a 'sociology of associations' has become known as Actor-Network-Theory, and this book is an essential introduction both for those seeking to understand Actor-Network-Theory, or the ideas of one of its most influential proponents.
因为是课程的Reaction paper,还没有交掉,仅供交流。 主要读的是Part 1里的 Third source of uncertainty: objects too have agency。这一章节有两个重点和无数好玩的点。 一、两个重点 第一个重点是将...
評分因为是课程的Reaction paper,还没有交掉,仅供交流。 主要读的是Part 1里的 Third source of uncertainty: objects too have agency。这一章节有两个重点和无数好玩的点。 一、两个重点 第一个重点是将...
評分因为是课程的Reaction paper,还没有交掉,仅供交流。 主要读的是Part 1里的 Third source of uncertainty: objects too have agency。这一章节有两个重点和无数好玩的点。 一、两个重点 第一个重点是将...
評分因为是课程的Reaction paper,还没有交掉,仅供交流。 主要读的是Part 1里的 Third source of uncertainty: objects too have agency。这一章节有两个重点和无数好玩的点。 一、两个重点 第一个重点是将...
評分因为是课程的Reaction paper,还没有交掉,仅供交流。 主要读的是Part 1里的 Third source of uncertainty: objects too have agency。这一章节有两个重点和无数好玩的点。 一、两个重点 第一个重点是将...
看完瞭。不過越看越睏惑的是,如果把ANT當做大象湯中的一勺兔子,會不會偏離瞭Latour的本意呢?我們還能煲湯嗎?
评分買瞭電紙書之後看的第一本書
评分很多點子其實很不錯但也很堂吉訶德,而且作者有時候把簡單的事說復雜瞭。
评分collection from lectures , a little disorder
评分J'aime les français beaucoup XDXDXD
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有