RUTH BENEDICT (1887-1948) was one of the twentieth century's foremost anthropologists and helped to shape the discipline in the United States and around the world. Benedict was a student and later a colleague of Franz Boas at Columbia, where she taught from 1924. Margaret Mead was one of her students. Benedict's contributions to the field of cultural anthropology are often cited today.
Essential reading for anyone interested in Japanese culture, this unsurpassed masterwork opens an intriguing window on Japan. Benedict's World War IIera study paints an illuminating contrast between the culture of Japan and that of the United States. The Chrysanthemum and the Sword is a revealing look at how and why our cultures differ, making it the perfect introduction to Japanese history and customs.
If one has to apply cultural anthropology to any ethnic group, and the ultimate goal is plausibility, the choice cannot get any better than Japan. The country and its people lend so readily to stereotypes, that it almost feels like bullying to categorize th...
评分 评分最近花了五天看了一本书,名曰《菊与刀》。与自身状态相比,我觉得这次行动很迅速,相比于以前半个学期磨掉的《吾国吾民》,算是质的进步。起码我的行为反馈给我自己,我再一次乐学了。 刚刚看完,趁着大脑还有些余热,写下点真切的感想,不论怎么样,多一种交流,多一种思想...
评分If one has to apply cultural anthropology to any ethnic group, and the ultimate goal is plausibility, the choice cannot get any better than Japan. The country and its people lend so readily to stereotypes, that it almost feels like bullying to categorize th...
评分If one has to apply cultural anthropology to any ethnic group, and the ultimate goal is plausibility, the choice cannot get any better than Japan. The country and its people lend so readily to stereotypes, that it almost feels like bullying to categorize th...
不太客观
评分在了解我们那个奇怪邻居的问题上,这本书是一个很好的注解,可以避免国内作者习惯性的偏见。西方研究者对日本人和对中国人一样不了解,反而可以中立的对我们进行比较。
评分里面用词都好不习惯呢 随便文学读多的结果
评分对于一个“民族”而言,其行为和思考方法之间是否存在系统性的内在联系?是否存在一种能够将行为与思考方法容纳其中的的整体结构?对这两个问题的肯定回答是本书研究的前提,也是大多数批评着眼之处。对习惯于各自视角的日本研究专家看来,书中提出的很多矛盾或可得到历史的、经济的、社会的甚至宗教的解释,唯独与“民族”关系不大,更不能用几个大而不当的文化patterns来概括。但在我看来,等级制、报恩、名誉、人情等固然是作者为了将诸多矛盾的原理实践连起来所添加的辅助线,也的确把一些无关的点给连了进来。但绝非”没有学术贡献“。相反,在文化这一尺度上分辨差异,既是了解他者的必要步骤,也包含了比较研究某种根本性的意旨,更不用说反常规的辅助线往往会激发新的学术想象。PS:阅读英文版可以更容易地带入严肃的文化研究者的角色
评分一个从未去过日本的人类学家,为美国战后政策提供参考所著。虽成书于70年前,但依然是了解日本文化的佳作: 忠,孝,恩与恩返,义理,似曾相识,而又不尽相同。育儿一章尤其细致入微,英美视角的剖析,对中国父母也很有借鉴意义。最有意思的是结语:作者认为日本军国主义与普鲁士威权主义有本质不同,且西式民选政府并不适用于东方文化,建议麦克阿瑟放弃德国占领模式,保留日本政府,仅以委员会形式间接参与政治。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有