Published originally in 1990 to critical acclaim, Robert Wade's "Governing the Market" quickly established itself as a standard in contemporary political economy. In it, Wade challenged claims both of those who saw the East Asian story as a vindication of free market principles and of those who attributed the success of Taiwan and other countries to government intervention. Instead, Wade turned attention to the way allocation decisions were divided between markets and public administration and the synergy between them. Now, in a new introduction to this paperback edition, Wade reviews the debate about industrial policy in East and Southeast Asia and chronicles the changing fortunes of these economies over the 1990s. He extends the original argument to explain the boom of the first half of the decade and the crash of the second, stressing the links between corporations, banks, governments, international capital markets, and the International Monetary Fund. From this, Wade goes on to outline a new agenda for national and international development policy.
评分
评分
评分
评分
韦德与詹鄂堪可并称东亚发展型国家范式二大家,其实二者颇有些区别。詹鄂的对话对象更近于现代化发展理论,醉心于日本的理性+长远官僚模式,其眼中的国家基本就以官僚机构(尤其是财政和经济发展机构)为代表,核心价值是某种颇具战略眼光的发展政策。儒家文化则是难以捉摸但确实有影响的因素。韦德似明显更受“带回国家”文集的影响,对话对象为新古典/新自由主义经济学,更注重国家各部分与企业、社会行动体、银行以至国际金融市场和管理机构的联系与博弈,且因选取台湾为案例,殖民因素也必须考量,发展战略是各行动体在台湾特殊的政治社会结构中以国民党为中心相互博弈而产生的成果,儒家文化因素则基本不存。可以说韦德已经指向了Peter Evans?
评分A critical thinking of neoliberalism
评分Taiwan case
评分引了这么多次,给个五星吧。不过为了证明government-directed development而说香港不是exception,有点勉强了。香港确实是laissez-faire啊。
评分韦德与詹鄂堪可并称东亚发展型国家范式二大家,其实二者颇有些区别。詹鄂的对话对象更近于现代化发展理论,醉心于日本的理性+长远官僚模式,其眼中的国家基本就以官僚机构(尤其是财政和经济发展机构)为代表,核心价值是某种颇具战略眼光的发展政策。儒家文化则是难以捉摸但确实有影响的因素。韦德似明显更受“带回国家”文集的影响,对话对象为新古典/新自由主义经济学,更注重国家各部分与企业、社会行动体、银行以至国际金融市场和管理机构的联系与博弈,且因选取台湾为案例,殖民因素也必须考量,发展战略是各行动体在台湾特殊的政治社会结构中以国民党为中心相互博弈而产生的成果,儒家文化因素则基本不存。可以说韦德已经指向了Peter Evans?
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有