齊格濛·鮑曼(Zygmunt Bauman, 1926- )當代最著名的社會傢與哲學傢之一,是“後現代主義”概念的主要創造者。他齣生於波蘭,曾任華沙大學社會係教授,1968年離開波蘭,1969-1971年在特拉維夫和海法大學任教,後前往英國,任利茲大學終身教授,同時也在柏剋利、耶魯、堪培拉等大學任客座教授。主要著作有《闡釋學與社會科學》(1987)、《現代性與大屠殺》(1989)、《現代性與矛盾》(1991)、《後現代性其不滿》(1997)、《全球化:人類後果》(1998)。
Attempting to provide a sociological explanation of the Holocaust, the main theme of this work is the demonstration that the Holocaust has to be understood as deeply involved with the nature of modernity - neither a single event nor a simple outpouring of barbarism. The author discusses what sociology can teach us about the Holocaust, but more particularly concentrates upon the lesson which the Holocaust has for sociology. There are two ways, he points out, in which the significance of the Holocaust can be side-stepped in our understanding of modernity. One way is to present the Holocaust as something which happened to the Jews, as an event in Jewish history. A second way is to regard the Holocaust as representing loathsome aspects of social life which the progress of modernity will increasingly overcome. Neither of these views stand up to scrutiny, according to the author.
前几节将大屠杀研究的几个基本的论点结合史料都说的挺详细,算是这方面理论的“集大成”。可惜后两节加上那篇发言稿所提供的解决方案简直是terrible,而且那种方案不但不会遏制道德的无王状态(见发言稿)反而会助长“以理杀人”这种大屠杀模式。 本书前几节略述如...
評分若说大屠杀的造成是由于理性制度的衍生物而来,譬如与受害者的隔离、技术化、官僚组织运作等等,那么是否也可以说,如果我们试图通过同样这般冷漠的理性制度来给予众人幸福,其实也是一种徒劳与妄想?进而言之,不论是怎样的制度,奴隶的、君主的、民主的,或者社会主义的,只...
評分第二次世界大战期间,纳粹德国加诸犹太人身上的暴行起初不为人知,后来逐渐得到了一个专有名词——“大屠杀”(Holocaust)——予以界定,仿佛其他的词汇都无法彰显这种暴行的史无前例和骇人听闻,至少犹太人和部分学者这般认为。不管大屠杀是否独一无二,必须承认的是,大屠杀...
評分近現代人類的發展建立在相信理性全能的基礎上。個人認為,這種理性大多指稱的是工具理性。啓蒙思想家們認為人要追求自己的幸福,這種幸福由利用自然而來。事實上,利用自然需要的是工具理性,用工具理性對自然進行程序化操作,便可使自然為我所用。在這個過程中,人成爲...
評分社會心理學課必讀書目。
评分Q:When one finds himself in a society wherein almost every condition that gave rise to the Holocaust could find its modern parallel, how should he feel and act? Is it merely historical contingency that prevents him from becoming complicit in the monstrosity that could materialize almost independent of his (and indeed, his fellow compatriots') will?
评分社會心理學課必讀書目。
评分讀完瞭換迴英文版標(……)有幾個段落可以收集起來寫共産主義和恐怖主義問題(但我什麼時候寫我不知道),p177-183關於pre-societal道德問題有點意思,所以走的是李維納斯路綫。感覺其實想說的是新的本體論(which也是梅洛最後在找的)但是並沒有到那個深度。總的來說還是沒怎麼超過大屠殺文學的水平,被老師按在我臉上要求讀瞭就讀瞭,沒有驚喜。
评分Q:When one finds himself in a society wherein almost every condition that gave rise to the Holocaust could find its modern parallel, how should he feel and act? Is it merely historical contingency that prevents him from becoming complicit in the monstrosity that could materialize almost independent of his (and indeed, his fellow compatriots') will?
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有