For more than thirty years, Fredric Jameson has been one of the most productive, wide-ranging, and distinctive literary theorists in the United States and the Anglophone world. Marxism and Form provided a pioneering account of the work of the major European Marxist theorists--T. W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Herbert Marcuse, Ernst Bloch, Georg Lukcs, and Jean-Paul Sartre--work that was, at the time, largely neglected in the English-speaking world. Through penetrating readings of each theorist, Jameson developed a critical mode of engagement that has had tremendous in.uence. He provided a framework for analyzing the connection between art and the historical circumstances of its making--in particular, how cultural artifacts distort, repress, or transform their circumstances through the abstractions of aesthetic form. Jameson's presentation of the critical thought of this Hegelian Marxism provided a stark alternative to the Anglo-American tradition of empiricism and humanism. It would later provide a compelling alternative to poststructuralism and deconstruction as they became dominant methodologies in aesthetic criticism. One year after Marxism and Form, Princeton published Jameson's The Prison-House of Language (1972), which provided a thorough historical and philosophical description of formalism and structuralism. Both books remain central to Jameson's main intellectual legacy: describing and extending a tradition of Western Marxism in cultural theory and literary interpretation.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
我怎么看都没看出这和马克思有什么关系，但他挑的人都非常有意思，然后对这些人的说法也没什么毛病。那个allegory和symbolic的区别好像挺好的。
评分我怎么看都没看出这和马克思有什么关系，但他挑的人都非常有意思，然后对这些人的说法也没什么毛病。那个allegory和symbolic的区别好像挺好的。
评分我怎么看都没看出这和马克思有什么关系，但他挑的人都非常有意思，然后对这些人的说法也没什么毛病。那个allegory和symbolic的区别好像挺好的。
评分本雅明那章可作为初读悲苦剧和论亲和力之后丧失信心后的一个summary，借他的清晰总结再回到混沌的本雅明再被折磨。这书，许多地方现在因为他的努力已成为共识，比如卢卡奇从早期到晚期的贯通之处，但仔细读却并没有发现他在那一团乱麻的形式/质料/中介概念中杀出血路或者有什么预感？他在描述现代性本身的状况时最强而有力，在布洛赫和萨特之上对普鲁斯特的解读便是如此，常能在细微的地方发现奥尔巴赫的影响。
评分本雅明那章可作为初读悲苦剧和论亲和力之后丧失信心后的一个summary，借他的清晰总结再回到混沌的本雅明再被折磨。这书，许多地方现在因为他的努力已成为共识，比如卢卡奇从早期到晚期的贯通之处，但仔细读却并没有发现他在那一团乱麻的形式/质料/中介概念中杀出血路或者有什么预感？他在描述现代性本身的状况时最强而有力，在布洛赫和萨特之上对普鲁斯特的解读便是如此，常能在细微的地方发现奥尔巴赫的影响。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有