张勉治(Michael G.Chang),美国乔治梅森大学历史与艺术史系副教授。加州大学圣迭哥分校历史学博士,师从周锡瑞、高彦颐等中国史研究名家。主要研究领域为16至19世纪中国的政治、社会、文化和经济,目前主要关注盛清时期的政治文化和物质文化。
Between 1751 and 1784, the Qianlong emperor embarked upon six southern tours, travelling from Beijing to Jiangnan and back. These tours were exercises in political theatre that took the Manchu emperor through one of the Qing empire's most prosperous regions. This study elucidates the tensions and the constant negotiations characterising the relationship between the imperial centre and Jiangnan, which straddled the two key provinces of Jiangsu and Zhejiang. Politically, economically and culturally, Jiangnan was the undisputed centre of the Han Chinese world; it also remained a bastion of Ming loyalism and anti-Manchu sentiment. How did the Qing court constitute its authority and legitimate its domination over this pivotal region? What were the precise terms and historical dynamics of Qing rule over China proper during the long 18th Century? In the course of addressing such questions, this study also explores the political culture within and through which High Qing rule was constituted and contested by a range of actors, all of whom operated within socially and historically structured contexts. The author argues that the southern tours occupied a central place in the historical formation of Qing rule during a period of momentous change affecting all strata of the 18th-Century polity.
乾隆末年,弘历发表重要谈话,说: 人生七十古来稀,予临御五十年,人老总想后事。中国有句古话叫盖棺定论,我虽未盖棺也快了,总可以定论吧!我一生干了两件事,一是西师,与准噶尔斗了几十年,把他赶尽杀绝了,回部几年,把大小和卓木送下地狱了。对这些事持异议的人不多。另...
评分“吾临御五十年,凡举二大事,一曰西师,一曰南巡。”[1]南巡,这个被乾隆帝视为关系帝国整体战略的重大事件,这个被民间津津乐道的传奇,在学术界却鲜有人系统研究,直到美国学者张勉治(Michael Chang)[2]《马背上的王朝:巡幸与清朝统治的构建,1680-1785》一书推出。如果...
评分 评分乾隆末年,弘历发表重要谈话,说: 人生七十古来稀,予临御五十年,人老总想后事。中国有句古话叫盖棺定论,我虽未盖棺也快了,总可以定论吧!我一生干了两件事,一是西师,与准噶尔斗了几十年,把他赶尽杀绝了,回部几年,把大小和卓木送下地狱了。对这些事持异议的人不多。另...
评分“吾临御五十年,凡举二大事,一曰西师,一曰南巡。”[1]南巡,这个被乾隆帝视为关系帝国整体战略的重大事件,这个被民间津津乐道的传奇,在学术界却鲜有人系统研究,直到美国学者张勉治(Michael Chang)[2]《马背上的王朝:巡幸与清朝统治的构建,1680-1785》一书推出。如果...
找材料的能力好于运用和解读材料的能力。
评分选题很好,史料很札实,只是里面很多概念的必要性值得讨论,比如ethno-dynastic,其实感觉没这个概念整个故事还是一样讲啊,但是作者用也确实没有太大问题。
评分南巡
评分新清史和族群视角蔚然成风之时出书,已将欧柯等人结论视为可接续之资源。起头试图在韦伯世袭官僚帝国中加入族群视角,将盛清国家构建视为基于族群家世而将世袭和忠孝原则扩展到中原士人群体和官僚体系的族群世袭国家,但结尾却把世袭官僚丢掉(尤其是花费笔墨谈乾隆利用精英群体和满汉官员间矛盾将忠心转移到自己身上后)而专谈族群效应。且开头称族群是流动概念不能想当然,文中又大量出现“XX是XX特性”之语句,令人费解。乾隆六次下江南对盛清帝国构建的影响:既以巡狩恢复古中华帝王传统,又以营帐策马骑射维持满族地位和凝聚满人认同;既展示帝王身份,又重申对官僚系统控制权;既以巡幸特考安抚(汉族)文人,又以动员资源配合西边军事展示武功;既笼络新兴商人和氏族精英,又凸显臣民皆需忠于天下一人。形成马上治天下之多面帝国形象。
评分选题很好,史料很札实,只是里面很多概念的必要性值得讨论,比如ethno-dynastic,其实感觉没这个概念整个故事还是一样讲啊,但是作者用也确实没有太大问题。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有