This edition includes, in addition to the most pertinent sections of The Fable’s two volumes, a selection from Mandeville’s An Enquiry into the Origin of Honor and selections from two of Mandeville’s most important sources: Pierre Bayle and the Jansenist Pierre Nicole. Hundert’s Introduction places Mandeville in a number of eighteenth-century debates—particularly that of the nature and morality of commercial modernity—and underscores the degree to which his work stood as a central problem, not only for his immediate English contemporaries, but for such philosophers as Hume, Rousseau, and Kant. The selections are substantive enough to faithfully represent Mandeville the social theorist, and compact enough to be used in courses that can afford to spend no more than a week on his work.
“Hundert is especially good at demonstrating how vital Mandeville’s ideas are as a major foundation for more famous Enlightenment thinkers such as Rousseau, Diderot, Voltaire and others. . . . The additions of Nicole and Bayle will be useful in courses on 18th century ethics and morals, and in general surveys of Enlightenment thought. This is probably the best one-volume edition of the main works of Mandeville now available.”
—Irwin Primer, Rutgers University
“An excellent edition of a much needed text. E. J.. Hundert’s addition of clear biographies, a coherent introduction, an appendix, and suggested readings adds to the book’s evident value in graduate and undergraduate teaching. Hundert has done an admirable job of contextualizing Mandeville’s Fable in the philosophical debates of human morality and sociability that were crucial to the development of liberalism. There can be no better and affordable introduction to the sources for students than Hundert’s new edition of this classic.”
—Fabio Lopez-Lazari, Arizona State University
E. J. Hundert is Professor of History, the University of British Columbia.
与旧版相比,最大的变化是当前这个版本更为完整了,此前没有译出的内容在这一版中都给补上了。不过Kaye的长篇导言和详尽的注释还是没有译出,当然译者在译序中也说明了这么做的理由,是否恰当实属见仁见智。不过书中大部分重要的译注仍取自Kaye的注释,窃以为标为“译注”不是...
评分人世间,什么是美德? 美德一定是维系社会发展的规则吗? 不一定. 这本书是经济学的祖父. 也是经济学假设的基础. 我们希望活在美好当中. 但是真实往往很残酷. 人的自利性,是社会发展的一种内在联系. 却被我们称为恶德. 不论我们是否喜欢,是否褒贬. 真实还是真实. 是我...
评分“人的道德行为,虽应当以理性和利他为重,但其动机则出于自爱或自利,人若除掉自爱,不但没有道德,连社会也不能存在。” “一切利他的或仁爱的德性,实际上只是想获得他人的赞美和避免受到谴责,因而不过是利己主义的伪装。” “理性只不过是情感的玩物。” “在沙夫茨伯里看...
评分网上到处都缺货,无奈之下只好看电子版了! 私人的利益与“公共利益”之间并非是非此即彼而可以是和谐的(至少从总体上和长远地来说),私人追求个人私益可由“看不见的手”导向服务于其他人的利益,只要是不“损人”的“利已”最终也会“利人”的。两百多年前曼德维尔和亚当...
评分曼德维尔悖论:私人恶德即公众利益。不是人之善,而是制度,会使坏人也可为大众的福祉服务;而制约自私行为恣意妄为的大多数制度是在人类实践中自然生成的;它们是人类行为的结果,但并非人类有意识设计的产物。曼德维尔认为,社会制度的发展,科学技术知识的增进等等,...
so evil yet so true. maybe that's why Bacon said he always liked bees because they not only acquire but also collaborate and contribute. I tend to perceive it philosophically yet abstractly(Hegel or Darwin), however, I have to say it's less offensing when valued in the economics way of thinking and justifying.[Mar 18th @ Brown Science lib, e-Book obtained from GG public domain]
评分Mandeville 实乃我的人生导师,灵魂伴侣
评分Mandeville 实乃我的人生导师,灵魂伴侣
评分so evil yet so true. maybe that's why Bacon said he always liked bees because they not only acquire but also collaborate and contribute. I tend to perceive it philosophically yet abstractly(Hegel or Darwin), however, I have to say it's less offensing when valued in the economics way of thinking and justifying.[Mar 18th @ Brown Science lib, e-Book obtained from GG public domain]
评分Mandeville 实乃我的人生导师,灵魂伴侣
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有