In addition to its interest as one of Plato's most brilliant dramatic masterpieces, the Protagoras presents a vivid picture of the crisis of fifth century Greek thought, in which traditional values and conceptions of humanity were subjected to criticism of the Sophists and to the far more
radical criticism of Socrates. The dialogue deals with many themes which are central to the ethical theories which Plato developed under the influence of Socrates, notably, the nature of human excellence, the relation of knowledge to right conduct, and the place of pleasure in the good life. This
revised edition includes a new Preface and Introduction, as well as numerous changes to the translation and commentary.
具体描述
读后感
The argument for this conclusion assumed from the outset that it is possible to go wrong voluntarily; this was Hippias' proposal in the case of Odysseus. But Socrates has stated the contrary, and in the same terms. The argument also assumes that people do g...
评分The argument for this conclusion assumed from the outset that it is possible to go wrong voluntarily; this was Hippias' proposal in the case of Odysseus. But Socrates has stated the contrary, and in the same terms. The argument also assumes that people do g...
评分那天，劉小楓老師說，這是柏拉圖最值得讀的書了。 “COMPANION: Where do you come from, Socrates? And yet I need hardly ask the question, for I know that you have been in chase of the fair Alcibiades. I saw him the day before yesterday; and he had got a beard...
评分The argument for this conclusion assumed from the outset that it is possible to go wrong voluntarily; this was Hippias' proposal in the case of Odysseus. But Socrates has stated the contrary, and in the same terms. The argument also assumes that people do g...
评分The argument for this conclusion assumed from the outset that it is possible to go wrong voluntarily; this was Hippias' proposal in the case of Odysseus. But Socrates has stated the contrary, and in the same terms. The argument also assumes that people do g...
用户评价
gay里gay气
评分回国前没空读了。6月20-23日。9月11日。
评分relativism与theory of form之间的争论
评分为了一个美少男，智者变得咄咄逼人。。。苏格拉底真是太会偷换概念了！
评分快樂計算法(hedonic calculus 見Protagoras)是一門技藝。掌握這門技藝的人不會有意作惡。但是有意作惡畢竟是可能的(見Hippias minor)，而德性不是技藝，它和快樂計算法是兩個不同的東西，需另作考察。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有