The work of a master critic writing at the peak of his powers, this magisterial book draws on speech act theory, as it originated with J. L. Austin and was further developed by Paul de Man and Jacques Derrida, to investigate the many dimensions of doing things with words in James' fiction. Three modes of speech act occur in James' novels. First, James' writing of his fictions is performative. He puts on paper words that have the power to raise in the reader the phantoms of imaginary persons. Second, James' writing does things with words that do other things in their turn, including conferring on the reader responsibility for further judgment and action: for example, teaching James' novels or writing about them. Finally, the narrators and characters in James' fictions utter speech acts that are forms of doing things with words- promises, declarations, excuses, denials, acts of bearing witness, lies, decisions publicly attested, and the like. The action of each work by James, he shows, is brought about by its own idiosyncratic repertoire of speech acts. In careful readings of six major examples, "The Aspern Papers", "The Portrait of a Lady", "The Awkward Age", "The Wings of the Dove", "The Golden Bowl", and "The Sense of the Past", Miller demonstrates the value of speech act theory for reading literature. J. Hillis Miller is UCI Distinguished Research Professor at the University of California at Irvine. One of the most recent many books is "Speech Acts in Literature".
评分
评分
评分
评分
这部小说的语言风格,带着一种近乎冷峻的疏离感,却又在偶尔的瞬间迸发出令人措手不及的、近乎抒情的优美。作者对词汇的选择极其考究,每一个动词和形容词的运用都精准地服务于他想要营造的氛围,没有任何一个词是多余的。它成功地构建了一个充满张力的世界,在这个世界里,宏大的历史背景与极其私密的个人遭遇被并置在一起,形成了一种强烈的对比。你可以在一页中读到对一幢建筑数十年的历史的宏观描述,紧接着下一页就是主角对一片落叶的近乎病态的关注。这种尺度上的转换,让人体会到个体在巨大历史洪流中的渺小与挣扎。读完这部作品,我感到了一种精神上的疲惫,但这种疲惫是充实的,因为它意味着我的思想被挑战了、我的感知被拓展了。它不是一本让你感到放松的书,而是一本让你感到被“打磨”过的书。
评分这部作品的叙事手法简直令人耳目一新,作者像是用一把手术刀解剖了人类情感的幽微之处。书中对人物内心挣扎的描绘,细腻到让人几乎能感受到那些文字背后的呼吸声。我尤其欣赏作者如何巧妙地设置那些看似不经意的对话,每一个词语的停顿、每一个眼神的交错,都蕴含着巨大的张力,推动着情节以一种近乎宿命般的节奏向前发展。它不像传统小说那样急于给出一个明确的结论,反而更像是在邀请读者一同进入一个迷宫,去探索那些模糊地带、那些灰色区域。初读时可能会感到有些晦涩,但随着深入,你会发现作者构建的世界观是多么的宏大而又精准。那种逐渐揭开谜底,却又发现谜底本身就是另一个更深层问题的过程,让人欲罢不能。这本书的文学价值绝不仅仅停留在故事本身,它更像是一场关于“存在”的哲学思辨,用文学的语言,探讨了时间、记忆与身份认同的复杂关系。读完之后,我花了很长时间才从那种沉浸式的阅读体验中抽离出来,那种挥之不去的余韵,至今仍在我脑海中回荡。
评分从结构上来说,这部作品的创新性是值得大书特书的。它完全打破了传统的时间线性叙事模式,采用了碎片化、多视角的交织手法,使得故事的整体面貌呈现出一种类似万花筒的复杂性。一开始,这些看似不连贯的片段让人感到困惑,仿佛是散落一地的拼图,但随着阅读的深入,你会发现,这些碎片并非随机排列,而是被一种更高层次的内在逻辑所牵引着,它们相互呼应,相互映照,最终拼凑出了一个令人心悸的整体图景。这种叙事上的“不确定性”,恰恰是作者想要传达的主题——即现实本身就是一种主观建构和不断重组的过程。我喜欢这种作者对读者的信任,他没有提供拐杖,而是放心地让我们自己去探索意义。这种叙事结构带来的智力上的满足感,是其他平铺直叙的作品难以企及的,它迫使我们重新思考“故事”的定义。
评分这本书最让我感到震撼的是它对于“沉默”的运用。很多时候,最重要的事情并非通过激烈的冲突或直白的陈述来表达,而是通过那些刻意的留白和未说出口的话语来传达。作者似乎深谙人际交往中的那种微妙的、潜意识的博弈,将角色之间的权力动态和情感鸿沟,以一种近乎手术般精确的方式剖析出来。例如,在某些场景中,角色的动作幅度极小,但通过环境光线的变化和道具的暗示,便足以勾勒出他们内心的惊涛骇浪。这要求读者必须具备极高的文学敏感度,去解读那些隐藏在文字表层之下的潜文本。它不像那些迎合大众口味的作品那样急于取悦,它更像是一块需要耐心打磨的璞玉,只有当你愿意投入时间去细细品味那些看似无关紧要的细节时,它才会展现出其璀璨的光芒。整本书读下来,我感觉自己仿佛参与了一场漫长而又安静的心理测验,深刻地认识到人与人之间沟通的局限性与美感。
评分我必须承认,这本书的阅读体验充满了挑战性,但正是这种挑战性,构筑了它非凡的魅力。作者的文字密度极高,句子结构常常是长而复杂的复合句,充满了古典文学的韵味和现代主义的破碎感。初看时,我不得不频繁地返回前文去重新梳理逻辑线索,这要求读者必须全神贯注,丝毫不能分心。然而,一旦你适应了这种独特的节奏和语流,你会惊叹于作者驾驭语言的功力。他仿佛是一位技艺精湛的音乐家,通过对音高、强弱的精确控制,编织出了一首关于现代社会疏离感的交响乐。书中对于环境的描写,并非是简单的背景交代,而是直接成为了叙事的一部分,那些冰冷的街道、潮湿的空气,无声地折射出人物命运的无力和荒谬。这本书不是用来轻松打发时间的消遣之作,它要求你拿出最高的敬意和最集中的精力,去与作者进行一场严肃的智力对话。这是一次对阅读耐心的终极考验,但回报是丰厚的——一种对语言潜能的全新认识。
评分1. the working definition of "literature as conduct" 2. the brief mentioning of speech act theory 3. the ineffectual division between the performative and the constative 4. what "performative" means for de Man and Derrida
评分1. the working definition of "literature as conduct" 2. the brief mentioning of speech act theory 3. the ineffectual division between the performative and the constative 4. what "performative" means for de Man and Derrida
评分1. the working definition of "literature as conduct" 2. the brief mentioning of speech act theory 3. the ineffectual division between the performative and the constative 4. what "performative" means for de Man and Derrida
评分1. the working definition of "literature as conduct" 2. the brief mentioning of speech act theory 3. the ineffectual division between the performative and the constative 4. what "performative" means for de Man and Derrida
评分1. the working definition of "literature as conduct" 2. the brief mentioning of speech act theory 3. the ineffectual division between the performative and the constative 4. what "performative" means for de Man and Derrida
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有