Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization 在線電子書 圖書標籤: 威權主義 民主化 比較威權研究 政治學 politics 民主轉型 中東政治 Responsiveness
發表於2024-11-22
Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024
黨派是否能夠穩固精英聯閤成為解釋民主化浪潮中是否走嚮真民主的變量,用瞭四個案例做瞭定性分析。
評分以精英整閤能力的作為核心變量的二分法,因果鏈條也過於簡單
評分以精英整閤能力的作為核心變量的二分法,因果鏈條也過於簡單
評分通過藍泉購買。
評分通過藍泉購買。
"Why does conducting elections sometimes undermine authoritarian regimes and sometimes seem to fortify them? Jason Brownlee answers this timely and provocative question in his study of four countries where elections produced unexpected outcomes: Egypt, Iran, Malaysia and the Philippines. From his close and careful reading of these electoral experiments, Brownlee concludes that their outcomes were shaped by the strength and solidity of the ruling parties. For scholars, students and policymakers alike, this salutary emphasis on the institutions that sustain and betray political regimes in transition is a valuable contribution, not only to the political science of democratization, but also to the policy debates about democracy promotion." -Lisa Anderson, Columbia University "Do elections in authoritarian states inevitably lead towards democracy, or do they serve as a safety valve allowing dictators to tighten their holds? Do even rigged elections indicate that some political competition is occurring, despite the regime's tight grip? These are the questions that Jason Brownlee tackles in his fascinating four-country study. Looking carefully at different historical trajectories of political parties, he unravels a central dilemma: why some authoritarian regimes have survived in an age of democratization, while others have given way to true democratic practices." -Joel Migdal, University of Washington "Brownlee's work serves as an autopsy of departed dictatorships and a diagnosis of the past and future health of persistent autocracies. He skillfully deploys an ingenious research design and abundant evidence from four countries to identify ruling parties that contain elite conflict as the main source of authoritarian stability. Yet the maintenance of ruling parties is medicine that some autocrats refuse to take. Fearing that they will become institutional bases of opposition, some ruling groups dismantle their own parties. In these cases, Brownlee demonstrates, uncontained elite conflict motivates the emergence of soft liners who may become leaders of democratic transitions. This ambitious and well-written book provides many important lessons about the origins and effects of political institutions. It is a 'must read' for scholars of regime dynamics." -David Waldner, University of Virginia "This is a welcome addition to recent work emphasizing the importance of institutions in nondemocratic regimes. [...]The care with which the author traces the theoretical claims through the empirical narratives is the book's greatest strength. What he finds within the cases themselves opens up potentially interesting new puzzles for future research." -Jennifer Gandhi, Emory University, Perspectives on Politics
(君不见诸位政治学者最近赶时髦,大谈祖国明天之民煮与革命前途。他们不谈理念,却竞相预言革命不会发生——权力博弈文化传统路径依赖国民素质利益斗争——预言中国政治的未来会走出自己的路!) 评论政治学著作,我也许不是最适合的人——因为我不常阅读这个学科的著作,因...
評分Brownlee, Jason, Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp.1-43, pp.201-222. 该书所要解释的主要问题是,在20世纪末民主化第三波浪潮的冲击下,为什么威权政体的转型会出现不同的发展路径?有的国家出现了...
評分(君不见诸位政治学者最近赶时髦,大谈祖国明天之民煮与革命前途。他们不谈理念,却竞相预言革命不会发生——权力博弈文化传统路径依赖国民素质利益斗争——预言中国政治的未来会走出自己的路!) 评论政治学著作,我也许不是最适合的人——因为我不常阅读这个学科的著作,因...
評分(君不见诸位政治学者最近赶时髦,大谈祖国明天之民煮与革命前途。他们不谈理念,却竞相预言革命不会发生——权力博弈文化传统路径依赖国民素质利益斗争——预言中国政治的未来会走出自己的路!) 评论政治学著作,我也许不是最适合的人——因为我不常阅读这个学科的著作,因...
評分Brownlee, Jason, Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp.1-43, pp.201-222. 该书所要解释的主要问题是,在20世纪末民主化第三波浪潮的冲击下,为什么威权政体的转型会出现不同的发展路径?有的国家出现了...
Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024