Jennifer Nagel, Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Toronto
Jennifer Nagel is Associate Professor of Philosophy and Associate Chair at the University of Toronto. Her research covers both historical and contemporary topics in epistemology. She has published on scepticism and empirical knowledge in Descartes and Locke and has also written a series of articles on intuitive ascriptions of knowledge.
Includes both historical and contemporary developments in the theory of knowledge
Expresses complex ideas in a clear and accessible way, using simple examples
Examines the relationship between knowledge and truth
Explores the central issues and debates in epistemology
Part of the bestselling Very Short Introductions series - over six million copies sold worldwide
What is knowledge? How does it differ from mere belief? Do you need to be able to justify a claim in order to count as knowing it? How can we know that the outer world is real and not a dream?
Questions like these are ancient ones, and the branch of philosophy dedicated to answering them - epistemology - has been active for thousands of years. In this thought-provoking Very Short Introduction, Jennifer Nagel considers these classic questions alongside new puzzles arising from recent discoveries about humanity, language, and the mind. Nagel explains the formation of major historical theories of knowledge, and shows how contemporary philosophers have developed new ways of understanding knowledge, using ideas from logic, linguistics, and psychology. Covering topics ranging from relativism and the problem of scepticism to the trustworthiness of internet sources, Nagel examines how progress has been made in understanding knowledge, using everyday examples to explain the key issues and debates
这本书写得很烂,作者大量地使用插入语、引语,致使文章读起来磕磕巴巴,缺乏节奏感。 第五章写得很垃圾垃圾,害得我费了一天的时间琢磨。那些吹捧的人如果不服,我来摘一段话,你给我现场说说啥意思。 估计作者没啥水平!你能感觉得到文章逻辑的混乱。这本书是领域综述的定位...
评分这本书写得很烂,作者大量地使用插入语、引语,致使文章读起来磕磕巴巴,缺乏节奏感。 第五章写得很垃圾垃圾,害得我费了一天的时间琢磨。那些吹捧的人如果不服,我来摘一段话,你给我现场说说啥意思。 估计作者没啥水平!你能感觉得到文章逻辑的混乱。这本书是领域综述的定位...
评分这本书写得很烂,作者大量地使用插入语、引语,致使文章读起来磕磕巴巴,缺乏节奏感。 第五章写得很垃圾垃圾,害得我费了一天的时间琢磨。那些吹捧的人如果不服,我来摘一段话,你给我现场说说啥意思。 估计作者没啥水平!你能感觉得到文章逻辑的混乱。这本书是领域综述的定位...
评分这本书写得很烂,作者大量地使用插入语、引语,致使文章读起来磕磕巴巴,缺乏节奏感。 第五章写得很垃圾垃圾,害得我费了一天的时间琢磨。那些吹捧的人如果不服,我来摘一段话,你给我现场说说啥意思。 估计作者没啥水平!你能感觉得到文章逻辑的混乱。这本书是领域综述的定位...
评分这本书写得很烂,作者大量地使用插入语、引语,致使文章读起来磕磕巴巴,缺乏节奏感。 第五章写得很垃圾垃圾,害得我费了一天的时间琢磨。那些吹捧的人如果不服,我来摘一段话,你给我现场说说啥意思。 估计作者没啥水平!你能感觉得到文章逻辑的混乱。这本书是领域综述的定位...
非常不错的导论,兼顾哲学史与现当代理论,又清楚明白。顺带八卦一笔,作者博士论文导师John McDowell,本人也是气质温婉的大美人。
评分大致搞清楚了——西哲的认识论果然强调知识本身和获取知识的access,似乎没有什么话题讨论the knower,这明明是很重要的一个要素,这个坑就靠认知科学来填了。
评分写得真是流畅精炼,看到把knowledge置于比belief更基础的位置上那段,眼前一亮。
评分大致搞清楚了——西哲的认识论果然强调知识本身和获取知识的access,似乎没有什么话题讨论the knower,这明明是很重要的一个要素,这个坑就靠认知科学来填了。
评分fusco有个视频说上完philosophy101感觉自己是“smartest person in the world”,这种写的简单的espitemology的书更是会让人有这种错觉,直到某天有个长者大喝一声“你们啊,naive!”
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有