Inequality and Democratization 在线电子书 图书标签: 政治经济学 比较政治 政治学 民主化 比较政治经济学 民主 比较政治学 David_Samuels
发表于2024-11-21
Inequality and Democratization 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2024
PE Core
评分理论野心很大,但不如预期。模型很简单,实证也比较粗糙。但是不失为一本有很大意义的著作,因为民主化理论不能只是A&R的基于中位选民提出的劫富济贫。独裁统治expropriation的一面和upper middle class与统治阶级的矛盾在Ansell & Samuels之前已经很久没人提了。
评分成为大佬的途径之一是挑战大佬
评分理论野心很大,但不如预期。模型很简单,实证也比较粗糙。但是不失为一本有很大意义的著作,因为民主化理论不能只是A&R的基于中位选民提出的劫富济贫。独裁统治expropriation的一面和upper middle class与统治阶级的矛盾在Ansell & Samuels之前已经很久没人提了。
评分PE Core
Ben W. Ansell is Professor of Comparative Democratic Institutions at Nuffield College, Oxford, and co-editor of Comparative Political Studies. His work on education, democracy, and housing markets has appeared in the American Political Science Review, Comparative Political Studies, World Politics, and International Organization. His book From the Ballot to the Blackboard (Cambridge University Press, 2010) was awarded the 2011 William Riker Prize by the Political Economy Section of the American Political Science Association.
David J. Samuels is Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Political Science at the University of Minnesota. He is the coauthor of Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers (Cambridge University Press, 2010); the author of Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil (Cambridge University Press, 2003); and the co-editor of Decentralization and Democracy in Latin America (2004). His work has appeared in the American Political Science Review, the American Journal of Political Science, Comparative Politics, Comparative Political Studies, Legislative Studies Quarterly, and the British Journal of Political Science. He currently serves as co-editor of Comparative Political Studies.
Research on the economic origins of democracy and dictatorship has shifted away from the impact of growth and turned toward the question of how different patterns of growth - equal or unequal - shape regime change. This book offers a new theory of the historical relationship between economic modernization and the emergence of democracy on a global scale, focusing on the effects of land and income inequality. Contrary to most mainstream arguments, Ben W. Ansell and David J. Samuels suggest that democracy is more likely to emerge when rising, yet politically disenfranchised, groups demand more influence because they have more to lose, rather than when threats of redistribution to elite interests are low.
The abstraction of the concept of ”inequality” is too high to render a research question as such a good one. In addition, the high abstraction often results in obscure and incomparable operationalization of the concept across contexts. Finally, the empiri...
评分The abstraction of the concept of ”inequality” is too high to render a research question as such a good one. In addition, the high abstraction often results in obscure and incomparable operationalization of the concept across contexts. Finally, the empiri...
评分The abstraction of the concept of ”inequality” is too high to render a research question as such a good one. In addition, the high abstraction often results in obscure and incomparable operationalization of the concept across contexts. Finally, the empiri...
评分The abstraction of the concept of ”inequality” is too high to render a research question as such a good one. In addition, the high abstraction often results in obscure and incomparable operationalization of the concept across contexts. Finally, the empiri...
评分The abstraction of the concept of ”inequality” is too high to render a research question as such a good one. In addition, the high abstraction often results in obscure and incomparable operationalization of the concept across contexts. Finally, the empiri...
Inequality and Democratization 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2024