Peter Schwieger is professor of Tibetology and the head of the Department of Mongolian and Tibetan Studies at the University of Bonn, Germany. His current research focuses on the political and social history of Tibet based on archival material.
A major new work in modern Tibetan history, this book follows the evolution of Tibetan Buddhism's trülku (reincarnation) tradition from the seventeenth to the nineteenth centuries, along with the Emperor of China's efforts to control its development. By illuminating the political aspects of the trülku institution, Schwieger shapes a broader history of the relationship between the Dalai Lama and the Emperor of China, as well as a richer understanding of the Qing Dynasty as an inner Asian empire, the modern fate of the Mongol empire, and current Sino-Tibetan relations.
Unlike other pre-twentieth century Tibetan histories, this volume rejects hagiographic texts in favor of diplomatic, legal, and social sources held in the private, monastic, and bureaucratic archives of old Tibet. This approach draws a unique portrait of Tibet's rule by reincarnation while shading in peripheral tensions in the Himalayas, eastern Tibet, and China. Its perspective fully captures the extent to which the emperors of China controlled the institution of the Dalai Lamas, making a groundbreaking contribution to the past and present history of East Asia.
评分
评分
评分
评分
借古讽今,强调政治控制转世,学术立场就不好。这或许是格鲁派的特色,但乾隆“敕灭”的夏玛巴一直都在传承又如何解释呢?史卫国的单一思维难免令此书颇多炒冷饭之嫌。
评分借古讽今,强调政治控制转世,学术立场就不好。这或许是格鲁派的特色,但乾隆“敕灭”的夏玛巴一直都在传承又如何解释呢?史卫国的单一思维难免令此书颇多炒冷饭之嫌。
评分借古讽今,强调政治控制转世,学术立场就不好。这或许是格鲁派的特色,但乾隆“敕灭”的夏玛巴一直都在传承又如何解释呢?史卫国的单一思维难免令此书颇多炒冷饭之嫌。
评分借古讽今,强调政治控制转世,学术立场就不好。这或许是格鲁派的特色,但乾隆“敕灭”的夏玛巴一直都在传承又如何解释呢?史卫国的单一思维难免令此书颇多炒冷饭之嫌。
评分借古讽今,强调政治控制转世,学术立场就不好。这或许是格鲁派的特色,但乾隆“敕灭”的夏玛巴一直都在传承又如何解释呢?史卫国的单一思维难免令此书颇多炒冷饭之嫌。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有