Peter Schwieger is professor of Tibetology and the head of the Department of Mongolian and Tibetan Studies at the University of Bonn, Germany. His current research focuses on the political and social history of Tibet based on archival material.
A major new work in modern Tibetan history, this book follows the evolution of Tibetan Buddhism's trülku (reincarnation) tradition from the seventeenth to the nineteenth centuries, along with the Emperor of China's efforts to control its development. By illuminating the political aspects of the trülku institution, Schwieger shapes a broader history of the relationship between the Dalai Lama and the Emperor of China, as well as a richer understanding of the Qing Dynasty as an inner Asian empire, the modern fate of the Mongol empire, and current Sino-Tibetan relations.
Unlike other pre-twentieth century Tibetan histories, this volume rejects hagiographic texts in favor of diplomatic, legal, and social sources held in the private, monastic, and bureaucratic archives of old Tibet. This approach draws a unique portrait of Tibet's rule by reincarnation while shading in peripheral tensions in the Himalayas, eastern Tibet, and China. Its perspective fully captures the extent to which the emperors of China controlled the institution of the Dalai Lamas, making a groundbreaking contribution to the past and present history of East Asia.
評分
評分
評分
評分
藉古諷今,強調政治控製轉世,學術立場就不好。這或許是格魯派的特色,但乾隆“敕滅”的夏瑪巴一直都在傳承又如何解釋呢?史衛國的單一思維難免令此書頗多炒冷飯之嫌。
评分藉古諷今,強調政治控製轉世,學術立場就不好。這或許是格魯派的特色,但乾隆“敕滅”的夏瑪巴一直都在傳承又如何解釋呢?史衛國的單一思維難免令此書頗多炒冷飯之嫌。
评分藉古諷今,強調政治控製轉世,學術立場就不好。這或許是格魯派的特色,但乾隆“敕滅”的夏瑪巴一直都在傳承又如何解釋呢?史衛國的單一思維難免令此書頗多炒冷飯之嫌。
评分藉古諷今,強調政治控製轉世,學術立場就不好。這或許是格魯派的特色,但乾隆“敕滅”的夏瑪巴一直都在傳承又如何解釋呢?史衛國的單一思維難免令此書頗多炒冷飯之嫌。
评分藉古諷今,強調政治控製轉世,學術立場就不好。這或許是格魯派的特色,但乾隆“敕滅”的夏瑪巴一直都在傳承又如何解釋呢?史衛國的單一思維難免令此書頗多炒冷飯之嫌。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有