Opposing the Rule of Law pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Nick Cheesman is a Research Fellow in the Department of Political and Social Change at the Australian National University, Canberra, where he studied for a PhD. In 2013 his dissertation, on the politics of law and order in Myanmar, won the university medal, the J. G. Crawford Prize; and, the President's Prize of the Asian Studies Association of Australia. Before joining the Australian National University he worked in Hong Kong with the Asian Legal Resource Centre, a regional research and advocacy organisation. Earlier he convened a people's tribunal on militarisation in Myanmar, for a Thailand-based non-profit group. He also lived and worked in a refugee camp on the border of Thailand and Myanmar for a number of years. He teaches courses in politics and security, and co-convenes the Myanmar/Burma Update conferences at the Australian National University. His work has appeared in a variety of peer-reviewed journals, and edited books. This is his first monograph.
- 法律社会学
- LAW
- 社会学
- 法律
- POLITICS
- 社会
- 政治
The rule of law is a political ideal today endorsed and promoted worldwide. Or is it? In a significant contribution to the field, Nick Cheesman argues that Myanmar is a country in which the rule of law is 'lexically present but semantically absent'. Charting ideas and practices from British colonial rule through military dictatorship to the present day, Cheesman calls upon political and legal theory to explain how and why institutions animated by a concern for law and order oppose the rule of law. Empirically grounded in both Burmese and English sources, including criminal trial records and wide ranging official documents, Opposing the Rule of Law offers the first significant study of courts in contemporary Myanmar. It sheds new light on the politics of courts during dark times and sharply illuminates the tension between the demand for law and the imperatives of order.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
[the rule of law is 'lexically present but semantically absent'.] Cheesman的方法论问题处理得很好啊>< 没有细看这本，纯粹借标 How in Myanmar “National Races” Came to Surpass Citizenship and Exclude Rohingya，关于缅甸民族认定和界分概念“taingyintha"的系谱学、司法体系与这种系谱学的关系、和这些如何导致Rohingya被排斥和杀戮（缅甸民族大团结叙事的官方用语和中国太高度相似了吧）。有用的点：state lexicon，semantic jumble，mythic unity，superordinate, truth regime
评分[the rule of law is 'lexically present but semantically absent'.] Cheesman的方法论问题处理得很好啊>< 没有细看这本，纯粹借标 How in Myanmar “National Races” Came to Surpass Citizenship and Exclude Rohingya，关于缅甸民族认定和界分概念“taingyintha"的系谱学、司法体系与这种系谱学的关系、和这些如何导致Rohingya被排斥和杀戮（缅甸民族大团结叙事的官方用语和中国太高度相似了吧）。有用的点：state lexicon，semantic jumble，mythic unity，superordinate, truth regime
评分这本书在系里被当成研究设计的典范来讨论不是没有理由的……光看nick当年那高级的proposal都可以产生一种方法论的迷信了
评分[the rule of law is 'lexically present but semantically absent'.] Cheesman的方法论问题处理得很好啊>< 没有细看这本，纯粹借标 How in Myanmar “National Races” Came to Surpass Citizenship and Exclude Rohingya，关于缅甸民族认定和界分概念“taingyintha"的系谱学、司法体系与这种系谱学的关系、和这些如何导致Rohingya被排斥和杀戮（缅甸民族大团结叙事的官方用语和中国太高度相似了吧）。有用的点：state lexicon，semantic jumble，mythic unity，superordinate, truth regime
评分[the rule of law is 'lexically present but semantically absent'.] Cheesman的方法论问题处理得很好啊>< 没有细看这本，纯粹借标 How in Myanmar “National Races” Came to Surpass Citizenship and Exclude Rohingya，关于缅甸民族认定和界分概念“taingyintha"的系谱学、司法体系与这种系谱学的关系、和这些如何导致Rohingya被排斥和杀戮（缅甸民族大团结叙事的官方用语和中国太高度相似了吧）。有用的点：state lexicon，semantic jumble，mythic unity，superordinate, truth regime
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有