Peter Singer identifies the central vision that unifies Marx's thought, enabling us to grasp Marx's views as a whole. He sees him as a philosopher primarily concerned with human freedom, rather than as an economist or a social scientist. He explains alienation, historical materialism, the economic theory of Capital, and Marx's ideas of communism, in plain English, and concludes with an assessment of Marx's legacy.
Capital, like Marx's other writings, is based on the idea that human beiings are in a state of alienation. It would be better to regard Capital as the work of critic of capitalist society. It's a work of art, of philosophical reflection and of social pol...
評分伴着金融危机,西方又掀起了反思资本主义和向马克思主义寻求答案的潮流。马克思的伟大之处在于他提出了一个关于人类的不平等的原因的理论,并提出了基本上可以自圆其说的解决方法。然而他的观点也是被误读和绑架得最多的。要理解马克思的真正意图,重新回到作为其思想根源的黑...
評分The fact that the worker obtains only the exchange-value, rather than the use-value, of his labour, means that in order to earn enough to support himself he has to work a full day – say, twelve hours –whereas his labour produces the use-values of the nece...
評分This book provides an easy access to Marxism, with vivid stories as well as the plain explanation, through which I could have a clear picture of why and how Marx develop those ideology. The writer introduces Marxism from his economic and historical philos...
評分Capital, like Marx's other writings, is based on the idea that human beiings are in a state of alienation. It would be better to regard Capital as the work of critic of capitalist society. It's a work of art, of philosophical reflection and of social pol...
簡明扼要,中正持平,不可多得
评分馬剋思首先是一個哲學傢而不是科學傢,他對資本主義的描述是藝術性的而非照相式的。盡管他在經濟上的很多預測都被事實否定,但作為“顛倒的黑格爾”馬剋思依然在哲學上有很高的地位。馬剋思第一個偉大貢獻是對自由市場的批判。“自由”的市場經濟未必是自由的,在其中無論是資本傢還是工人都會無意識地被人類自己的創造物——市場所控製而不是相反,商品成為一種宗教。馬剋思第二個偉大貢獻是指齣人類本性會隨著經濟發展和社會變化而改變(經濟基礎決定上層建築),所以廢除私産和公有化能促使人們從公共利益而不是私人利益齣發,這樣個人利益和公共利益就能和諧統一。然而,人類本性被永遠無法滿足的欲望所充斥,改變經濟基礎讓物質極大豐富也未必能讓人們看到私人利益與公共利益的統一,共産主義永遠隻能是烏托邦式的幻象。
评分要命 其實我是沒讀懂這本書的很多內容。。 我的水平太差瞭!繼續MARX-ING
评分Singer寫的馬剋思導論,按照時間的脈絡敘述其思想發展。Singer的詮釋既是對馬剋思的批評,也是對他的辯護:一方麵,他從可檢驗的角度,否定瞭馬剋思理論是一種科學;另一方麵,他又將馬剋思看作哲學傢,其思想理論對資本主義社會有深刻的揭示。值得一提,Singer沒有站在效益主義的角度批評馬剋思,反倒是提到馬剋思對效益主義的批評——後者質疑,為瞭“最大多數人的幸福”,其實隻是為瞭鞏固統治階級的利益而建立起來的道德幻象。這樣的信念成為通行的道德準則,隻會給無産階級帶來更殘酷的壓製。
评分20120111-20120116,kindle3
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有