Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius is based on the most up-to-date archaeological discoveries. It introduces new data, as well as new ways to think about them - modes of analysis that, while familiar to archaeological practitioners in the West and in Japan, are herein applied to evidence from the Chinese Bronze Age for the first time. The treatment of social stratification, clan and lineage organisation, as well as gender and ethnic differences will be of interest to those involved in the general or comparative analysis of grand themes in the Social Sciences.
Lothar von Falkenhausen obtained a PhD in anthropology at Harvard University in 1988. Having taught at Stanford University and UC Riverside, he came to UCLA in 1993 and was promoted to Professor in 1997. His research concerns the archaeology of the Chinese Bronze Age, preferably focusing on large interdisciplinary and historical issues on which archaeological materials can provide significant new information. One example of this orientation are his numerous publications on musical instruments (especially chime-bells), culminating in his book Suspended Music (University of California Press, 1993). Other publications concern ancient Chinese bronzes and their inscriptions, ritual, regional cultures, archaeological synthesis, ancient trans-Asiatic contacts, and methodological issues. As the American co-PI of the ongoing Peking University-UCLA Joint Archaeological Project, he is directing excavations at ancient salt-production sites in the Yangzi River Basin. He serves as editor of the Journal of East Asian Archaeology and of the Early China Special Monographs Series.
我是考古学和上古史的外行。但为了备课,每年这一段都绕不开,却也讲不明白。尤其是考古文化与传世文献之间的关系,论文看的越多越不明白。其中最显著的是二里头遗址,从各种角度论证二里头遗址是“中夏”、“晚夏”的研究简直不胜枚举。看完脑子却越来越晕了。 罗泰有一个好处...
评分一个月,中间搁置三周时间。连读两遍,因罗泰文句较绕。 尽量回避文献,据考古资料,通过统计数据作为论据。但其实大部分数据都不能下确切结论,不是数据不完整,就是抽样无代表性。即使得结论,也用各种但书来回避确切结论,但后面又用这种结论。真不知他这种方法与他所回避的...
评分罗泰《宗子维城》这本书真好。说:周公制礼乐这个事情可能是历史虚构,这种尝试进行过两次,一是在西周晚期,和春秋中期的礼制重构。 第16页认为,中国考古学界广泛使用的蒙特留斯的类型学,其实并不是一门真正的科学,而只是工匠的习惯而已。 张光直将商周时期的动物形象解释...
评分原意是想了解些关于铭文性质问题,随葬文书原因的意见,不过虽然本书对此也有提及,但绝非主体,着墨极少,不如看论文。 全书有两点让人印象深刻,第一,对学科独立性(特别是中国史研究领域)的大声疾呼,作者反复强调,文献能提供的许多内容,至少针对本书研究范围内的,都可...
各部分均有启发性的内容(制度性的、族群性的),值得再读一次
评分emmmm虽然感觉礼仪革命那种paradigm不是很靠谱……不过还蛮有收获的!
评分09.09 UMaryland图书馆 缺少先秦史和考古学基础 无法评论。
评分夏含夷書評如是寫道:「羅泰讓我們領略了很多那個時代的死人,卻對他們或者時候的愛恨情仇幾乎一無所知。」這大概也是研究範式之爭吧,說到底也是,誰讓這個學科從本質上說就是研究已死之人的事情呢。
评分各部分均有启发性的内容(制度性的、族群性的),值得再读一次
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有