Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius is based on the most up-to-date archaeological discoveries. It introduces new data, as well as new ways to think about them - modes of analysis that, while familiar to archaeological practitioners in the West and in Japan, are herein applied to evidence from the Chinese Bronze Age for the first time. The treatment of social stratification, clan and lineage organisation, as well as gender and ethnic differences will be of interest to those involved in the general or comparative analysis of grand themes in the Social Sciences.
Lothar von Falkenhausen obtained a PhD in anthropology at Harvard University in 1988. Having taught at Stanford University and UC Riverside, he came to UCLA in 1993 and was promoted to Professor in 1997. His research concerns the archaeology of the Chinese Bronze Age, preferably focusing on large interdisciplinary and historical issues on which archaeological materials can provide significant new information. One example of this orientation are his numerous publications on musical instruments (especially chime-bells), culminating in his book Suspended Music (University of California Press, 1993). Other publications concern ancient Chinese bronzes and their inscriptions, ritual, regional cultures, archaeological synthesis, ancient trans-Asiatic contacts, and methodological issues. As the American co-PI of the ongoing Peking University-UCLA Joint Archaeological Project, he is directing excavations at ancient salt-production sites in the Yangzi River Basin. He serves as editor of the Journal of East Asian Archaeology and of the Early China Special Monographs Series.
中国考古学和所有考古学一样,跨越人文学科和社会科学两个领域。本书侧重社会科学方面,主要分析中国青铜时代晚期(约前1000—前250年)有关社会结构、社会互动和社会变化的考古材料。那么考古材料能为我们的研究提供什么样的知识呢?在多大程度上,这些知识是真正新的,而不只...
评分1.有時文獻功夫顯得粗疏。 以《戰國策》一書為戰國時代其名稱來源(p8)。 2.作者的考古學觀念及方法論 強調考古材料自身對歷史上社會政治探索的價值,而不是如多數中國考古學家所流行的觀念那樣:僅僅作為文獻的佐證材料,或者特別傾向於以銘文材料為基於文獻的歷史學研究服務...
评分我是考古学和上古史的外行。但为了备课,每年这一段都绕不开,却也讲不明白。尤其是考古文化与传世文献之间的关系,论文看的越多越不明白。其中最显著的是二里头遗址,从各种角度论证二里头遗址是“中夏”、“晚夏”的研究简直不胜枚举。看完脑子却越来越晕了。 罗泰有一个好处...
评分我是考古学和上古史的外行。但为了备课,每年这一段都绕不开,却也讲不明白。尤其是考古文化与传世文献之间的关系,论文看的越多越不明白。其中最显著的是二里头遗址,从各种角度论证二里头遗址是“中夏”、“晚夏”的研究简直不胜枚举。看完脑子却越来越晕了。 罗泰有一个好处...
评分罗泰《宗子维城》这本书真好。说:周公制礼乐这个事情可能是历史虚构,这种尝试进行过两次,一是在西周晚期,和春秋中期的礼制重构。 第16页认为,中国考古学界广泛使用的蒙特留斯的类型学,其实并不是一门真正的科学,而只是工匠的习惯而已。 张光直将商周时期的动物形象解释...
emmmm虽然感觉礼仪革命那种paradigm不是很靠谱……不过还蛮有收获的!
评分Archaeology independent from transmitted text. Lineage-clan-ethnic, gender, class. Two ritual reformations: late western zhou/ middle spring and autumn.
评分被confucius支配的痛苦hhhhhhh /lothar可是当了我一个term的男神
评分各部分均有启发性的内容(制度性的、族群性的),值得再读一次
评分汉学家的著作,偏重考古材料和现代阐释,缺少文献和文字材料的研究脉络。看重异质性人群的研究,但大多数问题还是国内学者看得更深。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有