Lothar von Falkenhausen obtained a PhD in anthropology at Harvard University in 1988. Having taught at Stanford University and UC Riverside, he came to UCLA in 1993 and was promoted to Professor in 1997. His research concerns the archaeology of the Chinese Bronze Age, preferably focusing on large interdisciplinary and historical issues on which archaeological materials can provide significant new information. One example of this orientation are his numerous publications on musical instruments (especially chime-bells), culminating in his book Suspended Music (University of California Press, 1993). Other publications concern ancient Chinese bronzes and their inscriptions, ritual, regional cultures, archaeological synthesis, ancient trans-Asiatic contacts, and methodological issues. As the American co-PI of the ongoing Peking University-UCLA Joint Archaeological Project, he is directing excavations at ancient salt-production sites in the Yangzi River Basin. He serves as editor of the Journal of East Asian Archaeology and of the Early China Special Monographs Series.
Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius is based on the most up-to-date archaeological discoveries. It introduces new data, as well as new ways to think about them - modes of analysis that, while familiar to archaeological practitioners in the West and in Japan, are herein applied to evidence from the Chinese Bronze Age for the first time. The treatment of social stratification, clan and lineage organisation, as well as gender and ethnic differences will be of interest to those involved in the general or comparative analysis of grand themes in the Social Sciences.
原意是想了解些关于铭文性质问题,随葬文书原因的意见,不过虽然本书对此也有提及,但绝非主体,着墨极少,不如看论文。 全书有两点让人印象深刻,第一,对学科独立性(特别是中国史研究领域)的大声疾呼,作者反复强调,文献能提供的许多内容,至少针对本书研究范围内的,都可...
评分一个月,中间搁置三周时间。连读两遍,因罗泰文句较绕。 尽量回避文献,据考古资料,通过统计数据作为论据。但其实大部分数据都不能下确切结论,不是数据不完整,就是抽样无代表性。即使得结论,也用各种但书来回避确切结论,但后面又用这种结论。真不知他这种方法与他所回避的...
评分罗泰此书出版时,夏含夷曾写过一篇书评,他对罗泰本书中刻意回避文献的研究方式表示了批评。然而细读罗泰此书,我们似乎可以从罗泰这种近于极端的以考古学为中心的方法中学到一些东西。从罗泰的选题、方法选择以及研究效果上我们也可以追迹他这种“偏颇”的考古中心的刻意性。 ...
评分一个月,中间搁置三周时间。连读两遍,因罗泰文句较绕。 尽量回避文献,据考古资料,通过统计数据作为论据。但其实大部分数据都不能下确切结论,不是数据不完整,就是抽样无代表性。即使得结论,也用各种但书来回避确切结论,但后面又用这种结论。真不知他这种方法与他所回避的...
评分中国考古学和所有考古学一样,跨越人文学科和社会科学两个领域。本书侧重社会科学方面,主要分析中国青铜时代晚期(约前1000—前250年)有关社会结构、社会互动和社会变化的考古材料。那么考古材料能为我们的研究提供什么样的知识呢?在多大程度上,这些知识是真正新的,而不只...
emmmm虽然感觉礼仪革命那种paradigm不是很靠谱……不过还蛮有收获的!
评分各部分均有启发性的内容(制度性的、族群性的),值得再读一次
评分被confucius支配的痛苦hhhhhhh /lothar可是当了我一个term的男神
评分09.09 UMaryland图书馆 缺少先秦史和考古学基础 无法评论。
评分汉学家的著作,偏重考古材料和现代阐释,缺少文献和文字材料的研究脉络。看重异质性人群的研究,但大多数问题还是国内学者看得更深。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有