Lothar von Falkenhausen obtained a PhD in anthropology at Harvard University in 1988. Having taught at Stanford University and UC Riverside, he came to UCLA in 1993 and was promoted to Professor in 1997. His research concerns the archaeology of the Chinese Bronze Age, preferably focusing on large interdisciplinary and historical issues on which archaeological materials can provide significant new information. One example of this orientation are his numerous publications on musical instruments (especially chime-bells), culminating in his book Suspended Music (University of California Press, 1993). Other publications concern ancient Chinese bronzes and their inscriptions, ritual, regional cultures, archaeological synthesis, ancient trans-Asiatic contacts, and methodological issues. As the American co-PI of the ongoing Peking University-UCLA Joint Archaeological Project, he is directing excavations at ancient salt-production sites in the Yangzi River Basin. He serves as editor of the Journal of East Asian Archaeology and of the Early China Special Monographs Series.
Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius is based on the most up-to-date archaeological discoveries. It introduces new data, as well as new ways to think about them - modes of analysis that, while familiar to archaeological practitioners in the West and in Japan, are herein applied to evidence from the Chinese Bronze Age for the first time. The treatment of social stratification, clan and lineage organisation, as well as gender and ethnic differences will be of interest to those involved in the general or comparative analysis of grand themes in the Social Sciences.
1.有時文獻功夫顯得粗疏。 以《戰國策》一書為戰國時代其名稱來源(p8)。 2.作者的考古學觀念及方法論 強調考古材料自身對歷史上社會政治探索的價值,而不是如多數中國考古學家所流行的觀念那樣:僅僅作為文獻的佐證材料,或者特別傾向於以銘文材料為基於文獻的歷史學研究服務...
评分罗泰此书出版时,夏含夷曾写过一篇书评,他对罗泰本书中刻意回避文献的研究方式表示了批评。然而细读罗泰此书,我们似乎可以从罗泰这种近于极端的以考古学为中心的方法中学到一些东西。从罗泰的选题、方法选择以及研究效果上我们也可以追迹他这种“偏颇”的考古中心的刻意性。 ...
评分美国加州大学洛杉矶分校的罗泰教授(Lothar von Falkenhausen)很喜欢中国的美食,性情也相当温和,但谈及中国考古学的现状时,他会很激烈地批评电视台的《鉴宝》类节目,批评一些大学考古系开设的面向文物收藏家的公众考古课程。作为著名考古学家张光直先生的学生,他对维护中...
评分 评分中国考古学和所有考古学一样,跨越人文学科和社会科学两个领域。本书侧重社会科学方面,主要分析中国青铜时代晚期(约前1000—前250年)有关社会结构、社会互动和社会变化的考古材料。那么考古材料能为我们的研究提供什么样的知识呢?在多大程度上,这些知识是真正新的,而不只...
范围广泛,观点新颖,材料清晰
评分Archaeology independent from transmitted text. Lineage-clan-ethnic, gender, class. Two ritual reformations: late western zhou/ middle spring and autumn.
评分汉学家的著作,偏重考古材料和现代阐释,缺少文献和文字材料的研究脉络。看重异质性人群的研究,但大多数问题还是国内学者看得更深。
评分对材料没有特别陌生,所以也还读的下去,从物质到人群,和上次讨论课的主题一致,然而我的骚讲能力还是不太够。
评分夏含夷書評如是寫道:「羅泰讓我們領略了很多那個時代的死人,卻對他們或者時候的愛恨情仇幾乎一無所知。」這大概也是研究範式之爭吧,說到底也是,誰讓這個學科從本質上說就是研究已死之人的事情呢。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有