* Winner of the C. Wright Mills Award of the Society for the Study of Social Problems and the Distinguished Scholarly Publication Award of the American Sociological Association
In a dazzling new interpretation of four hundred years of modern French history, Charles Tilly focuses not on kings and courtiers but on the common people of village and farm buffeted by the inexorable advance of large-scale capitalism and the consolidation of a powerful nation-state. Tilly, author of The Vend�e and many other books, chooses the contention of the masses as his medium in painting this vivid picture of the people's growing ability and willingness to fight injustice, challenge exploitation, and claim their own place in the hierarchy of power.
Contention is not necessarily disorder. The more we look at contention, says Tilly, the more we discover order created by the rooting of collective action in everyday social life through a continuous process of signaling, negotiation, and struggle. In seventeenth-century France, ordinary people did not know how to demonstrate, rally, or strike, but they had standard procedures for expelling a tax collector, undermining a corrupt official, and shaming moral offenders. By the end of the eighteenth century, French people were experimenting with delegations, public meetings, and popular justice. Through the nineteenth century, with the growth of an industrial proletariat, they developed an extensive repertoire of strikes, demonstrations, and direct attacks on landlords and capitalists, as well as conflicts setting worker against worker. In the twentieth century, scenarios of protest expanded to even larger-scale forms such as mass meetings, electoral campaigns, and broad-based social movements.
Rather than arguing these developments in the abstract, The Contentious French provides lively descriptions of real events, with pauses to make sense of their patterns. The result is a view of politics with the common struggle for power at its core and the changing structure of power as its envelope.
The Contentious French is bound to be controversial, and therefore required reading for specialists in European history, social movements, and collective action. Its fresh approach will also appeal to students and general readers.
Charles Tilly is Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science, Columbia University. His work focuses on large-scale social change and its relationship to contentious politics, especially in Europe since 1500. His most recently published books are The Politics of Collective Violence (Cambridge University Press, 2003), Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650-2000 (Cambridge University Press, 2004), Social Movements, 1768-2004 (Paradigm Press, 2004), Economic and Political Contention in Comparative Perspective (Paradigm Press, co-authored and co-edited with Maria Kousis, 2005), Trust and Rule (Cambridge University Press, 2005), Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834 (Paradigm Press, 2005, revised paperback edition of 1995 book), and Identities, Boundaries, and Social Ties (once again Paradigm Press, 2005).
He has recently completed Why? (Princeton University Press, forthcoming), the Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis (co-edited and co-authored with Robert Goodin, Oxford University Press, forthcoming), and Regimes and Repertoires (publisher pending). He is co-authoring (with Sidney Tarrow) Contentious Politics (under contract with Paradigm Press) and co-authoring (with John Coatsworth, Juan Cole, Michael Hanagan, Peter Perdue, and Louise A. Tilly) Politics, Exchange, and Social Life in World History (Wadsworth/Thomson). He is helping run the Russian Academy of Sciences – (U.S.) National Academy of Sciences joint project on conflict in multi-ethnic polities.
Charles Tilly's writings on methodology are found here: http://professor-murmann.info/index.php/weblog/tilly
今年是法国大革命230周年,这场革命深刻改变和铸造了现代世界,让人类久久回味。新京报列出了几本今年值得关注的有关法国大革命的书,包括北大出版社的《[法国人民:四个世纪、五个地区的历史]》,中信出版社的《自由与毁灭:法国大革命,1789-1799》,文景的《环法之书:大革...
评分 评分查尔斯蒂利是量化历史分析的代表者,在《法国人民》一书依然有一些量化痕迹的存在,比如,书中有大量图表和描述性统计,但是,这并不是标准的统计分析。蒂利也没有进行深入的个案分析,而是对法国境内不同区域前后四个多世纪的群体性抗争事件做出历史叙述和分析。 事实上,《法...
评分查尔斯蒂利是量化历史分析的代表者,在《法国人民》一书依然有一些量化痕迹的存在,比如,书中有大量图表和描述性统计,但是,这并不是标准的统计分析。蒂利也没有进行深入的个案分析,而是对法国境内不同区域前后四个多世纪的群体性抗争事件做出历史叙述和分析。 事实上,《法...
评分墨分五彩看法国 据说中国画中的水墨画分为五个层次:墨,淡墨,浓墨,极淡墨和焦墨。唐宋时的水墨画常用湿笔,人说是“水晕墨章”,到了元代开始用干笔,方有“如兼五彩”的效果。 读Charles Tilly 的作品《法国人民》,于学术资料浩如烟海的爬梳中,却常见法国17世纪以来社...
这本书的行文风格简直是一股清流,读起来完全没有传统历史著作的枯燥感。作者似乎深谙如何将复杂的历史细节编织成引人入胜的故事,重点在于“人”的体验而非冰冷的事件堆砌。我尤其喜欢他处理人物传记片段的手法,那些关于十八世纪末巴黎知识精英们私生活的侧写,那些关于咖啡馆里的八卦和宫廷里的阴谋,被描绘得活灵活现。这不仅仅是历史的复述,更像是一部高智商的社会群像剧。书中对“公共领域”(Public Sphere)的构建过程有着非常细腻的刻画,展示了咖啡馆、沙龙乃至邮政系统如何共同孕育出一种前所未有的舆论环境,这种环境反过来又对王权构成了实质性的挑战。这种“自下而上”的视角,让我对历史事件的发生机制有了全新的认识——原来很多看似突如其来的变革,都是在这些日常的、看似不重要的社交互动中悄然酝酿成熟的。作者的文字富有画面感,读到激动人心处,我几乎能闻到当时的烟草味和廉价香水味,感受到那种知识分子群体在压抑中寻求突破的焦灼与兴奋。这是一本让人愿意一气呵成读完,并且读完后还想立刻找人讨论一番的书。
评分坦率地说,这本书的理论框架极具启发性,但其行文风格颇为疏离和冷峻,带有浓厚的后结构主义色彩。作者似乎不太关心传统意义上的“故事流畅性”,而是更侧重于解构既有的历史概念和叙事范式。他不断地质疑“革命的必然性”这一论断,并尝试从“意外事件”和“偶然选择”的角度来重塑事件的发生轨迹。书中对语言的分析达到了近乎偏执的程度,探讨了特定词汇(如“人民”、“国家”、“自由”)在不同语境下的权力转移和意义漂移。这种对文本本体的深度挖掘,使得全书的阅读体验更像是在进行一场高强度的智力辩论,而非休闲阅读。它要求读者具备相当的理论预备知识,否则很容易迷失在作者精心构建的符号迷宫之中。然而,一旦跨越了初期的门槛,那种豁然开朗的感觉是无与伦比的——它强迫你放弃对历史因果的简单线性理解,转而接受一个更加碎片化、更具多重解释可能性的复杂世界图景。这本书无疑是给资深研究者和对思想史有深度兴趣的读者准备的盛宴。
评分从学术研究的角度来看,这本书展现了极高的研究深度和广度,它挑战了许多既有的关于法国革命起因的定论。作者似乎花费了大量心血在档案室里,那些对地方行政记录和教会档案的挖掘,令人印象深刻。他并未满足于巴黎的精英叙事,而是将目光投向了外省,试图描绘一个更具地方特色的、多元化的“不满”图景。这种跨区域的比较研究,揭示了不同地区在经济压力、社会等级和文化传统上的差异如何塑造了他们对改革的不同反应。书中的一个核心论点,即“财政危机仅仅是点燃导火索,而深层的结构性矛盾早已渗透到社会肌理的每一个角落”,通过详实的数据和案例得到了有力的支撑。我尤其欣赏作者对“身份政治”在当时萌芽阶段的辨析,他清晰地说明了“公民”身份的建构是如何与旧有特权阶层的瓦解相互作用的。然而,这种详尽有时也带来了一定的阅读障碍,某些章节的论证密度极高,需要反复阅读才能完全消化其中的复杂关联,但这恰恰也印证了其学术价值的不可替代性。
评分这部作品给我带来了一次知识的探险,作者的叙事功力毋庸置疑。他以一种近乎纪录片的严谨态度,对法国大革命前夕的社会思潮进行了深入的剖析。读完全书,我仿佛置身于沙龙的辩论之中,耳边充斥着启蒙思想家的激昂言辞与旧制度守旧派的愤懑不平。尤其值得称赞的是,作者对当时报刊和地下小册子的引用和解读,使得那些被历史尘封的观点得以重见天日。他并未简单地将当时的知识分子脸谱化,而是细致地展现了他们思想光谱中的细微差别,以及这些差异如何在政治实践中被放大和扭曲。例如,书中对卢梭与伏尔泰在人性论和国家构建上的分歧,不仅仅是哲学层面的梳理,更将其置于具体的社会权力斗争中进行考察,这让读者能更深刻地理解“理性”是如何成为一把双刃剑的。全书的论证结构犹如精密的钟表,逻辑链条环环相扣,从启蒙的源头追溯到社会结构的腐朽,最终导向不可避免的爆发。语言的驾驭也颇具匠心,时而如手术刀般精准剖析概念,时而又如史诗般宏大叙事,令人沉浸其中,难以自拔。对于任何想超越教科书层面,真正理解法国“思想气质”的读者来说,这本书无疑提供了一个极佳的视角。
评分这本书的叙事节奏控制得非常巧妙,它拥有史诗般的开阔视野,却又能在最关键的转折点上,将焦点精准地收缩到个体命运的悲剧中。作者在处理政治理念的传播时,没有使用那种宏大叙事的腔调,而是通过几个关键人物——一位失意的贵族学者、一位充满激情的印刷商,以及一位对外界充满好奇的乡村教士——的故事线索来串联起时代的脉搏。这种“以小见大”的手法,极大地增强了文本的情感张力。每一次政治口号的出现,都不再是抽象的理论,而是与这些人物的希望、恐惧和最终的幻灭紧密联系在一起。读到后半部分,当历史的洪流开始失控时,那种宿命感和无力感扑面而来,让人不禁为书中人物的命运感到唏嘘。作者对“期望的政治”(Politics of Expectation)这一概念的阐释尤为精妙,他表明,正是因为人们对一个更光明、更理性的未来抱持了近乎宗教般的狂热信念,才使得最终的现实反噬显得如此残酷和剧烈。这本书读起来,与其说是在学习历史,不如说是在经历一场关于希望与绝望的深刻人性探索。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分