Christine Mollier reveals in this volume previously unexplored dimensions of the interaction between Buddhism and Taoism in medieval China. While scholars of Chinese religions have long recognized the mutual influences linking the two traditions, Mollier here brings to light their intense contest for hegemony in the domains of scripture and ritual. Drawing on a far-reaching investigation of canonical texts, together with manuscript sources from Dunhuang and the monastic libraries of Japan - many of them studied here for the first time - she demonstrates the competition and complementarity of the two great Chinese religions in their quest to address personal and collective fears of diverse ills, including sorcery, famine, and untimely death.
目录：
Chapter 1 The Heavanly Kitchens
Chapter 2 In Pursuit of the Socerers
Chapter 3 Augmenting the Life Account
Chapter 4 Under Stellar Protection
Chapter 5 Guanyin in a Daoist Guise
具体描述
读后感
Through exhaustive comparison between Zhengtong daozang (DZ) and various Buddhist scriptures collected in Buddhist canons (discovered from Dunhuang caves and different libraries), Mollier shows us readers a picture of Buddho-Daoist mutual appropriation, bot...
评分Through exhaustive comparison between Zhengtong daozang (DZ) and various Buddhist scriptures collected in Buddhist canons (discovered from Dunhuang caves and different libraries), Mollier shows us readers a picture of Buddho-Daoist mutual appropriation, bot...
评分Through exhaustive comparison between Zhengtong daozang (DZ) and various Buddhist scriptures collected in Buddhist canons (discovered from Dunhuang caves and different libraries), Mollier shows us readers a picture of Buddho-Daoist mutual appropriation, bot...
评分Through exhaustive comparison between Zhengtong daozang (DZ) and various Buddhist scriptures collected in Buddhist canons (discovered from Dunhuang caves and different libraries), Mollier shows us readers a picture of Buddho-Daoist mutual appropriation, bot...
评分Through exhaustive comparison between Zhengtong daozang (DZ) and various Buddhist scriptures collected in Buddhist canons (discovered from Dunhuang caves and different libraries), Mollier shows us readers a picture of Buddho-Daoist mutual appropriation, bot...
用户评价
说是研究Buddho-Taoist exchange，感觉更像是研究佛教如何“抄袭”道教（唯一的例外是最后一章）。实则，敦煌材料至少在时间上早于明代的道藏。是否能断定佛教一定是抄袭的我们现在所能见到的那种“道教”呢？这或许是要打大问号的。3.5分
评分只是找了幾個敦煌文獻比較閱讀了一下，比較像是讀書筆記
评分挺有意思的
评分说是研究Buddho-Taoist exchange，感觉更像是研究佛教如何“抄袭”道教（唯一的例外是最后一章）。实则，敦煌材料至少在时间上早于明代的道藏。是否能断定佛教一定是抄袭的我们现在所能见到的那种“道教”呢？这或许是要打大问号的。3.5分
评分题材有趣，不管佛道把自己的思想标得多超脱，作为宗教都是不得不回应与解决俗世困扰的，如何吃，行，延年益算，驱鬼除噩梦。作者的推断是，往往一个宗教率先讨论了某个俗世困扰，同期的另一个教就迫切地要想出对应的对策，而由于时间迫切，或是没有更好的材料组织，这个对策很有可能是粗暴的夺取另一边的想法和模板。至于哪一个传统被接纳，推崇，存活得更久，其实不取决于其内容或宗派，而更多在于他的accessibility and availbility to local practitioners.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有