James C. Scott is Sterling Professor of Political Science, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrarian Studies Programme, Yale University, and a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
For two thousand years the disparate groups that now reside in Zomia (a mountainous region the size of Europe that consists of portions of seven Asian countries) have fled the projects of the organized state societies that surround them?slavery, conscription, taxes, corvée labor, epidemics, and warfare. This book, essentially an ?anarchist history,? is the first-ever examination of the huge literature on state-making whose author evaluates why people would deliberately and reactively remain stateless. Among the strategies employed by the people of Zomia to remain stateless are physical dispersion in rugged terrain; agricultural practices that enhance mobility; pliable ethnic identities; devotion to prophetic, millenarian leaders; and maintenance of a largely oral culture that allows them to reinvent their histories and genealogies as they move between and around states.
In accessible language, James Scott, recognized worldwide as an eminent authority in Southeast Asian, peasant, and agrarian studies, tells the story of the peoples of Zomia and their unlikely odyssey in search of self-determination. He redefines our views on Asian politics, history, demographics, and even our fundamental ideas about what constitutes civilization, and challenges us with a radically different approach to history that presents events from the perspective of stateless peoples and redefines state-making as a form of ?internal colonialism.? This new perspective requires a radical reevaluation of the civilizational narratives of the lowland states. Scott?s work on Zomia represents a new way to think of area studies that will be applicable to other runaway, fugitive, and marooned communities, be they Gypsies, Cossacks, tribes fleeing slave raiders, Marsh Arabs, or San-Bushmen.
(《云南社会科学》2019年第三期) | 王晓毅 如果将社会发展看做一个简单的线性发展过程,山地社会往往被看做是落后的,并被认为会在先进文明的影响下,逐步发展起来。但是斯科特在《逃避统治的艺术》一书中,构建了与这种想象不同的山地文明,山地为山地居民提供了保护,从而...
评分(《云南社会科学》2019年第三期) | 王晓毅 如果将社会发展看做一个简单的线性发展过程,山地社会往往被看做是落后的,并被认为会在先进文明的影响下,逐步发展起来。但是斯科特在《逃避统治的艺术》一书中,构建了与这种想象不同的山地文明,山地为山地居民提供了保护,从而...
评分自国家诞生以来的文明历史上,国家和建立国家的民族一直是历史书写的主体和基本单位。国家、文明、历史,三者搅和在了一起。而这种文明史的一个组成部分就是,“有历史的人群”为“没有历史的人群”书写历史,并且最初当然是作为统治权延伸的附属记录来编制。与之相对,以种种...
评分 评分为了证明自己的观点而打造证据的痕迹太明显。
评分教授今天还送了我一本
评分最大的问题是所有的resistence都可以另外解释为Scott异化的'tribal people'对所置身环境的自然回应,只不过这类似心理层面的解释也无法去正面推翻……如果不是为了论文,真不想去看这么fancy的东西……
评分逃离国家——逃离的是臣民的身份,而不是与国家的关系。实际上,山民一直在寻找与国家的适当关系,才能让自己生存下来。
评分西南研究不得不看。略读加精读,两天总算搞定,关于高地社会族群认同bandwidth的讨论非常有趣。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有