Douglass C. North is co-recipient of the 1993 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science. He is Spencer T. Olin Professor in Arts and Sciences at Washington University, St Louis and Bartlett Burnap Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.
John Joseph Wallis is Professor of Economics at the University of Maryland and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Barry R. Weingast is Ward C. Krebs Family Professor in the Department of Political Science and a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.
All societies must deal with the possibility of violence, and they do so in different ways. This book integrates the problem of violence into a larger social science and historical framework, showing how economic and political behavior are closely linked. Most societies, which we call natural states, limit violence by political manipulation of the economy to create privileged interests. These privileges limit the use of violence by powerful individuals, but doing so hinders both economic and political development. In contrast, modern societies create open access to economic and political organizations, fostering political and economic competition. The book provides a framework for understanding the two types of social orders, why open access societies are both politically and economically more developed, and how some 25 countries have made the transition between the two types.
读的时候就感到有种奇怪的味道,说不出来。看到http://book.douban.com/review/6341166/后豁然开朗。 总结下来:本书信息量大、有历史学功底,比《国家为什么失败》更精致、更富有建设性。然而仍然过分简化了复杂的历史现实,只有单调而贫瘠的类型学,而缺乏更进一步的谱系学...
评分There is little need to readdress the significance of this book. A minimal introduction will suffice. The book is a bold attempt to consolidate fragments of political theories under one roof. It purposes a framework to understand the operation of political...
评分 评分哥伦比亚大学教授华尔特·皮特金(Walter B. Pitkin)在《人类愚蠢历史简论》里说, “愚蠢是一种最大的社会之恶,它是由三个部分结合而成: 首先,愚蠢的人非常之多。 其次,商业、金融、外交、政治的大权都掌握在愚蠢程度不等的人们手上。 第三,高超的能力经常与严重的愚蠢...
评分读的时候就感到有种奇怪的味道,说不出来。看到http://book.douban.com/review/6341166/后豁然开朗。 总结下来:本书信息量大、有历史学功底,比《国家为什么失败》更精致、更富有建设性。然而仍然过分简化了复杂的历史现实,只有单调而贫瘠的类型学,而缺乏更进一步的谱系学...
书中作者自创了大量概念,使开篇第一章的理论部分较为晦涩。全书试图构建的从“有限进入”到“公开进入”的社会秩序转变陷入了对两种秩序的描述,而对真正的秩序转型描述并不清晰。作者的理论基本由英、美、法三个国家的政治发展史提炼出来的,以至于应用到其他国家时难免显得生硬。不过书里强调了组织在社会发展中的作用,是North对先前研究的一个重要补充。
评分毕竟是经济学家,欠缺历史素养
评分the base of Acemoglu and Robinson's theory of inclusive & extractive institutions in 'Why Nations Failed'
评分the base of Acemoglu and Robinson's theory of inclusive & extractive institutions in 'Why Nations Failed'
评分the base of Acemoglu and Robinson's theory of inclusive & extractive institutions in 'Why Nations Failed'
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有