評分
評分
評分
評分
it investigates an array of recent theories and controversies in the field of legal philosophy and especially shows us a reflective view of numerous prominent issues in the tradition of analytic philosophy, although as an immovable proponent of Ronald Dworkin, I don't agree with its critiques. But still an interesting interesting book to read.
评分it investigates an array of recent theories and controversies in the field of legal philosophy and especially shows us a reflective view of numerous prominent issues in the tradition of analytic philosophy, although as an immovable proponent of Ronald Dworkin, I don't agree with its critiques. But still an interesting interesting book to read.
评分it investigates an array of recent theories and controversies in the field of legal philosophy and especially shows us a reflective view of numerous prominent issues in the tradition of analytic philosophy, although as an immovable proponent of Ronald Dworkin, I don't agree with its critiques. But still an interesting interesting book to read.
评分it investigates an array of recent theories and controversies in the field of legal philosophy and especially shows us a reflective view of numerous prominent issues in the tradition of analytic philosophy, although as an immovable proponent of Ronald Dworkin, I don't agree with its critiques. But still an interesting interesting book to read.
评分看瞭其中幾篇,kramer這種挑刺式的批判,還必須結閤批判對象的原文來讀纔行。雖然很細緻,但也難怪引用率不高。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有