Growing interest in the ideas of the German legal and political theorist Carl Schmitt have sparked an interest in the thinkers and ideas that influenced him. Chief among those influences stands the 19th-century Spanish and conservative thinker Juan Donoso Cortes (1809-1853). Donoso stands in a unique place in the ideological trajectory of conservative, counter-revolutionary thought that started with the reaction of Joseph de Maistre and Louis de Bonald against the French Revolution and culminated in the rise of fascism in the early twentieth century. As the philosophical successor of de Maistre, Donoso kept de Maistre's ideas on authority and infallibility alive in the midst of the ideological and political controversies and the revolutionary tumult of Europe in the mid-19th century. Donoso's theories on infallibility played a crucial role in the definition of papal infallibility during the First Vatican Council in 1870. His theory on dictatorship changed the focus of continental conservative thought away from emphasizing the restoration of a hierarchically ordered civilization through the restoration of the monarchical ancient regime to the establishment of order and hierarchy by any necessary and effective means. This theory and his critique of parliamentarianism were especially reflected in the Franco regime in Spain and in the political and legal theories of Carl Schmitt. All the speeches and writings of Cortes that influenced Schmitt are contained in this volume. These major theoretical works appear in English for the first time. Only the Speech on Dictatorship has appeared in English to date. Johnson's Introduction provides extensive commentary on the works and theories developed in them by showing the historical and philosophical context from which they emerged and by pointing out their significance in the development of the counter-revolutionary ideological trajectory leading from de Maistre to fascism. Until now, Donoso has been studied by a small group of mostly conservative and Catholic scholars. This translation makes his ideas more readily available for study by students and scholars of political theory.
坦白说,初次接触时,我曾被其宏大叙事和繁复的修辞所震慑,一度感到有些难以消化。这套选集所展现的知识广度令人咋舌,从神学思辨到世俗政治,从国际关系到个体伦理,几乎无所不包,形成了一个极其自洽的知识体系。这让我意识到,理解这位思想家的全貌,绝不是一蹴而就的事情,需要不断地在不同的篇章间穿梭对照,才能构建起完整的认知框架。更令人惊叹的是,作者在构建其理论体系时所引用的历史典故和哲学根源,展现了他扎实的古典学功底。这套书无疑是为那些真正愿意沉浸在复杂思想迷宫中探索的读者准备的。它提供的不是简单的答案,而是更深刻、更具有挑战性的问题,不断拷问着读者的固有认知边界。
评分这本书的装帧和排版实在让人眼前一亮,初拿到手时,那种厚重感和纸张的质感就透着一股经典的味道。封面设计简洁却富有深意,那种古典的字体仿佛将人瞬间拉回了那个波谲云诡的时代。内页的字迹清晰,间距适中,长时间阅读下来眼睛也不会感到疲劳。我特别欣赏出版社在注释和索引方面的用心,那些详尽的背景介绍和人名地名解释,对于我们这些对那个历史时期了解不深的读者来说,简直是福音。它不仅仅是一套书,更像是一份精心准备的学术礼品。从触摸到的那一刻起,我就知道,这不仅仅是知识的堆砌,更是一种对阅读体验的尊重。每次翻开它,都能感受到那种沉甸甸的历史分量,让人不由得感到,自己正在与一位重要的思想家进行一场跨越时空的对话。这种实体书带来的仪式感,是任何电子设备都无法替代的。
评分从一个纯粹的文学欣赏角度来看,这本书的文本质量也是一流的。作者的行文风格充满了巴洛克式的华丽与戏剧性,尤其是在他阐述危机和变革时,那种强烈的修辞技巧和排比句式,极具感染力。阅读时,脑海中仿佛能浮现出他在议会大厅中慷慨陈词的画面,他的文字带着一种无可辩驳的现场感和无可替代的个人魅力。这种将严密逻辑包裹在华美辞藻之下的写作手法,使得即便是枯燥的政治理论,也焕发出一种近乎史诗般的壮阔。我甚至会忍不住停下来,反复朗读那些结构精巧的句子,感受其内在的韵律和节奏。这套选集不仅是思想的载体,它本身就是一件精妙的文字艺术品,值得反复玩味和品鉴。
评分对于研究特定历史阶段的学者来说,这套选集的价值是无可估量的,它提供的不仅仅是结论,更是那个时代知识精英思维模式的活化石。通过细读,我们可以清晰地看到,在面对革命的冲击和旧秩序的瓦解时,一位顶尖的保守派思想家是如何进行自我调适、并试图为未来擘画蓝图的。他的焦虑、他的坚持、他对人性弱点的深刻洞察,都毫无保留地展现在这些文字之中。我个人认为,这本书的真正力量在于它能够跨越单纯的“左”与“右”的标签,直指权力、秩序和传统这些永恒的政治母题。它迫使我们反思,在任何一个剧变时期,我们所坚信的那些“理所当然”的原则,其根基是否依然稳固。这套书提供的视角,是批判性思考的绝佳催化剂。
评分阅读这些选集的过程,简直就是一场对十九世纪欧洲政治思想脉络的深度探险。作者的论述风格极其雄辩,充满了那个时代特有的激情与逻辑的严谨性。他似乎总能直击问题的核心,用一种近乎预言家的口吻,剖析着自由主义与保守主义之间的永恒张力。我常常被他那层层递进的论证结构所折服,仿佛他手中的笔就是一把手术刀,精准地切开了当时社会病灶的表象,直达其内部的腐朽之处。尤其是在讨论主权与权力合法性那几篇中,那种对国家本质的深刻洞察力,即使放在今天来看,依然振聋发聩。这种思辨的强度,要求读者必须全神贯注,稍有走神,便可能错过他抛出的一个关键转折点。这绝不是可以“快餐式”阅读的文本,它需要你放慢节奏,细细品味每一个措辞背后的历史重量。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分