Purity and Danger pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Mary Douglas is a central figure within British social anthropology. Studying under Evans-Pritchard at Oxford immediately after the war, she formed part of the group of anthropologists who established social anthropology's standing in the world of scholarship. Her works, spanning the second half of the twentieth century, have been widely read and her theories applied across the social sciences and humanities.
- 人类学
- Theory
- 社会学
- 哲学
- food
- Anthropology
Professor Douglas writes gracefully, lucidly and polemically. She continually makes points which illuminate matters in the philosophy of religion and the philosophy of science and help to show the rest of us just why and how anthropology has become a fundamentally intellectual discipline' - New Society Professor Douglas' book sparkles with intellectual life and is characterised by a concern to understand. Right or wrong, sound or idiosyncratic, it presents a rare and exciting spectacle of a mind at work.' - Times Literary Supplement
具体描述
读后感
当代人类学的某种弥合式假定，把较简单的事情和相对复杂的事情混起来聊。我被迫读的英文版，开头不久就聊in some primitive cultures the sacred is a very general idea meaning little more than prohibition. 动不动就拿原始文化说事儿，而且，顺理成章地，仪式，被当作是文...
评分 评分道格拉斯对旧约《圣经》的理解，有她自己的考量。她认为，圣经作者将某些反常的动物，现象，不符合一种特定的分类目录，归为unclean。要证明道格拉斯的观点基本很难，因为当时留存，可以相互印证的文本很少。而且道格拉斯也不是《圣经》研究者，她基本没有通过《圣经》成书时代...
评分在网上找到一些此书的书评。发现阐发的内容多于对本书的总结，反而容易对欲读此书者造成误导。 其实作者讨论的核心是如何通过分类建立社会秩序。有关旧约中《利未记〉食物分类，只是一个引子。证明的是1) 食物的偏好其实反映了人与上帝之间的关系：只有可以上祭坛的，才可以被...
评分看完后，从题目开始做一轮梳理和理解。洁净的反面是脏，脏是什么，是污秽（impurity），是危险(danger)。玛丽•道格拉斯从人类对污秽的看法中发现了人类思维结构的特点，建立了一种对污秽的象征的分析方法：人类在不同领域有不同的分类系统，污秽（肮脏）就是不处于某种分...
用户评价
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有