Althusser's Lesson pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Jacques Ranciere, Jacques Rancière taught at the University of Paris VIII, France, from 1969 to 2000, occupying the Chair of Aesthetics and Politics from 1990 until his retirement.

Emiliano Battista,

Emiliano Battista is a PhD candidate in Philosophy at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. He is the translator of Jacques Rancière's Film Fables (Berg, 2006).

出版者:Continuum

作者:Jacques Rancière

出品人:

頁數:160

译者:Emiliano Battista

出版時間:2011-9-1

價格:US$19.95

裝幀:Hardcover

isbn號碼:9781441108050

叢書系列:

圖書標籤:

朗西埃
阿爾都塞
Rancière
theory
Jacques_Ranciere
JacquesRanciere
Althusser

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到圖書目錄大全

book.wenda123.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

Jacques Rancière’s first major work, Althusser’s Lesson appeared in 1974, just as the energies of May 68 were losing ground to the calls for a return to order. Rancière’s analysis of Althusserian Marxism unfolds against this background: what is the relationship between the return to order and the enthusiasm which greeted the publication of Althusser’s Reply to John Lewis in 1973? How to explain the rehabilitation of a philosophy that had been declared ‘dead and buried on the barricades of May 68’? What had changed? The answer to this question takes the form of a genealogy of Althusserianism that is, simultaneously, an account of the emergence of militant student movements in the ‘60s, of the arrival of Maoism in France, and of how May 68 rearranged all the pieces anew. Encompassing the book’s distinctive combination of theoretical analysis and historical description is a question that has guided Rancière’s thought ever since: how do theories of subversion become the rationale for order?

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

用戶評價

评分☆☆☆☆☆

此作被認為是朗西埃的弑父之作，阿爾都塞在自傳中卻認為此書錶達的無非是對他不退齣法共的譴責，其實此書簡直就是對阿的全麵批判，主要針對的文本包括A Reply to John Lewis，意識形態國傢機器、列寜與哲學、Student Problems，附錄中有朗在風暴期間所寫的On theoy of ideology: Althusser's politics,為法文版所沒有

评分☆☆☆☆☆

curious how relevant it is in current world

评分☆☆☆☆☆

curious how relevant it is in current world