This is a fully revised 2002 edition of what is already one of the most successful volumes in the entire series of Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. This revision incorporates the many refinements to the translation of Utopia undertaken for the dual-language scholarly edition published by Cambridge in 1995, and Professor Logan has also updated the editorial commentary and introduction to take account of scholarship published since the first Cambridge Texts edition of Utopia appeared in 1989. This Logan-Adams edition is firmly established as the most accurate, accessible and student-friendly rendition of Utopia currently available. All the usual series features are included, with a concise introduction, chronology of More's life, and notes for further reading. This revised rendition should introduce further generations of students to Utopia, one of the most influential books in the western philosophical and literary tradition, and one of the supreme achievements of Renaissance humanism.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
More在Utopia裏探討的從不是怎樣建立政治意義上的社會模型，而是在從宗教和道德的意義上“圓滿”的狀態。作者自己也明白這是“理想化的”，給的從來都不是確定的答案（在末尾處和letters裏都有提到）。因此，Utopia和空想主義、共産主義完全是不能等同的。聯係More的時代背景和其虔誠一生最後被亨利八世砍頭的經曆，讀這本書的時候總是不自覺地對作者産生敬意。
评分Finally, I finished this book in this country, which at least for me, is closer to Utopia. Utopia is not a perfect world, but an ideal world. A contrast to our society, especially for human nature. People there seems to live a happy life, but somehow I just feel it's lifeless, where everyone is almost the same. Fragile, isn't it?
评分More在Utopia裏探討的從不是怎樣建立政治意義上的社會模型，而是在從宗教和道德的意義上“圓滿”的狀態。作者自己也明白這是“理想化的”，給的從來都不是確定的答案（在末尾處和letters裏都有提到）。因此，Utopia和空想主義、共産主義完全是不能等同的。聯係More的時代背景和其虔誠一生最後被亨利八世砍頭的經曆，讀這本書的時候總是不自覺地對作者産生敬意。
评分Finally, I finished this book in this country, which at least for me, is closer to Utopia. Utopia is not a perfect world, but an ideal world. A contrast to our society, especially for human nature. People there seems to live a happy life, but somehow I just feel it's lifeless, where everyone is almost the same. Fragile, isn't it?
评分More在Utopia裏探討的從不是怎樣建立政治意義上的社會模型，而是在從宗教和道德的意義上“圓滿”的狀態。作者自己也明白這是“理想化的”，給的從來都不是確定的答案（在末尾處和letters裏都有提到）。因此，Utopia和空想主義、共産主義完全是不能等同的。聯係More的時代背景和其虔誠一生最後被亨利八世砍頭的經曆，讀這本書的時候總是不自覺地對作者産生敬意。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有