Religion for Atheists

Religion for Atheists pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

Q&A with Author Alain De Botton

Q: Is it possible to be a good person without religion?

A: The problem of the man without religion is that he forgets. We all know in theory what we should do to be good. The problem is that in practice, we forget. And we forget because the modern secular world always thinks that it is enough to tell someone something once (be good, remember the poor etc.) But all religions disagree here: they insist that if anyone is to stand a chance of remembering anything, they need reminders on a daily, perhaps even hourly basis.

Q: What do you think of the aggressive atheism we have seen in the past few years?

A: I am an atheist, but a gentle one. I don't feel the need to mock anyone who believes. I really disagree with the hard tone of some atheists who approach religion like a silly fairy tale. I am deeply respectful of religion, but I believe none of its supernatural aspects. So my position is perhaps unusual: I am at once very respectful and completely impious.

Q: Are you nostalgic for the deeply religious past?

A: Like many people, of course I feel nostalgic. How is it possible not to feel nostalgic when you look at 15th frescoes or the rituals of an ancient carnival? However, we have to ask: how should I respond to my nostalgia? My thought is that we can use it creatively, as the basis for a rebirth, for the creation of new things, for the creation of things that later generations will feel nostalgic about... So it frustrates me when people say things like, 'Well, they knew how to build in the 15th century, now it is impossible...' Why! Anything is possible. We should not sigh nostalgically over religion, we should learn from them. We should steal from them.

Q: If we were to replace religion with a secular equivalent, who would be our gurus?

A: We don't need a central structure. We are beyond the age of gurus and inspirational leaders. We are in the age of the Wiki structure. This means that it is up to all of us to look at religion and see what bits we can steal and place into the modern world. We might all contribute to the construction of new temples, not the government, but the concerned, interested individual. The salvation of the individual soul remains a serious problem--even when we dismiss the idea of God. In the 20th century, capitalism has really solved (in the rich West) the material problems of a significant portion of mankind. But the spiritual needs are still in chaos, with religion ceasing to answer the need. This is why I wrote my book, to show that there remains a new way: a way of filling the modern world with so many important lessons from religion, and yet not needing to return to any kind of occult spirituality.

Q: Don't you think that, in order to truly appreciate religious music and art, you have to be a believer--or, at least, don't you think that non-believers miss something important in the experience?

A: I am interested in the modern claim that we have now found a way to replace religion: with art. You often hear people say, 'Museums are our new churches'. It's a nice idea, but it's not true, and it's principally not true because of the way that museums are laid out and present art. They prevent anyone from having an emotional relationship with the works on display. They encourage an academic interest, but prevent a more didactic and therapeutic kind of contact. I recommend in my book that even if we don't believe, we learn to use art (even secular art) as a resource for comfort, identification, guidance and edification, very much what religions do with art.

出版者:Pantheon
作者:[英] 阿兰·德波顿
出品人:
页数:320
译者:
出版时间:2012-3-6
价格:USD 26.95
装帧:Hardcover
isbn号码:9780307379108
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 哲学 
  • 宗教 
  • 阿兰·德波顿 
  • Allen.De.Botton 
  • 文化 
  • 英国 
  • 随笔 
  • 神学 
  •  
想要找书就要到 图书目录大全
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

From the author of The Consolations of Philosophy, a deeply provocative and useful argument about how we can benefit from the wisdom and power of religion—without having to “believe” in any of it.

What if religions aren’t either all true or all nonsense?

The sterile debate between fundamentalist believers and non-believers is finally advanced by Alain de Botton’s astonishing new book, which boldly argues that the supernatural claims of religion are of course entirely false—and yet religion still has some very important things to teach the secular world.

Religion for Atheists suggests that atheists shouldn’t trash religion, they should steal from it—because the world’s religions are packed with good ideas on how we should live in and arrange our societies. In a highly original and readable tone that blends deep respect with total impiety, de Botton (a non-believer himself) proposes that we should look to religions for insights on, among other topics, how to: build a sense of community, make our relationships last, dampen feelings of envy and inadequacy, escape the 24-hour media world, go traveling, get more out of art, and build new businesses geared around our emotional needs.

For too long non-believers have faced a stark choice between either swallowing lots of peculiar doctrines or doing away with a range of consoling and beautiful rituals and ideas. At last, Alain de Botton, the author of the bestselling The Consolations of Philosophy and How Proust Can Change Your Life , has produced a far more interesting and truly helpful alternative.

具体描述

读后感

评分

评分

打开这本书的时候,我正反思自己以看书作为爱好的原因。同样地,在每次看完书后写下读后感的目的,应该不仅仅是针对某一本书的感想,而是,从一本书引发对自己生活的感悟。所以,写一本书与自己的故事的乐趣远远大于单单写一篇读后感。 买书,有惊喜,也有遗憾,在开始读一本...  

评分

近几年特别想寻找一个宗教皈依,给自己的心灵找一个依靠,不知道这样的目的对不对。把宗萨钦哲仁波切的几本书反复看了几遍,觉得这样发愿并不好,应该是以追求证悟的目的。可心这不系之舟,总是易风雨飘摇,难以安稳,以前我总是用读书来获取心灵的踏实。总听人讲,信仰的力量...  

评分

因为研究一个小课题,又读此书,特别是此章节,诸多启发。 (一)接受何种教育 1、世俗教育假定受众能够拥有一定的良知和平静,成熟、独立。 世俗教育强调文化的传承,即提供大量事实性信息;大学师生们对教学内容的投入是认真而感人的,其教学内容和考试题目旨在培养视野狭窄...  

评分

我猜到 这本书肯定会有强烈的争议。。。。果然,持贬低观点的都挺激烈的........大家不要这样....... 觉得作者的语言真挺厉害的,确实是那种侃侃而谈顺畅流利的,虽然是翻译成中文的,但是作者表达观点时的语言状态确实很好。而且,前面作者一再强调的,世俗社会中人们追逐名...  

用户评价

评分

New perspective, with humorous insight, through which a creative understanding of religion emerges. Museum part is the best for me.

评分

这本书是注定的两边不讨好。作者对宗教抱持着疏离的态度,从实用主义出发,这个我们可以学、那个我们可以用,十有八九遭到各大教派反感。而从无神论者的角度看,作者说了很多宗教形式上的好处,而完全没有谈及教义可能对多元化社会造成的负面影响,就得到了“我们不能没有宗教”的结论,让人觉得实在不能接受。但如果当成听一个特别爱琢磨事儿的无神论者跟你饭后唠唠磕,这书还是挺好看的。给我印象最深的一点是,他提到无神论者比有神论者更乐观,他们相信随着科技和社会的发达,美好未来是可以在现世实现的;而有神论者则觉得这是不可能的事,转而把希望放在死后承诺的永恒。如果人生态度的出发点就如此不同。。。我真的觉得无神论者和有神论者没法沟通唉。但求和平共处,政教分离= =

评分

宗教去掉神学和迷信的部分后就一无是处了吗?本书认真的探讨了宗教的社会意义,对于已经不怎么信教的现代人的有哪些启迪。作者爱东拉西扯,也爱旁征博引,有时略装腔作势,有时又幽默亲切。也许你不会觉得每个观点你都赞同,但至少可以促进你的思考。力荐!

评分

站在基督徒老师和同学面前介绍这本书,大家一脸疑惑,难道这是不是基督徒的圣经吗?其实就是作者对不是任何信仰的人怎么欣赏艺术,看到教育之类的解读。

评分

开头和结束章比较闷,中间比如教育很好看,谈艺术那部分太短了,再展开点就好。虽然作者说一书之力绵薄,他的写作保持连贯关注人的内在世界,观点也在不断重申,是德波顿式的“宗教”

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有