The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 在線電子書 圖書標籤: 科學哲學 哲學 科學史 science 曆史 科學 英文版 科學人文
發表於2024-11-21
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024
主意看起來很簡單但是其實還是挺復雜的,一不小心就會(像我的教授一樣)把Kuhn誤讀。The main purpose of this book is to dispense science from naive rules and methods, the messianic Truth, and transcendental Nature, but not to argue that science does not progress and scientists in different communities cannot possibly communicate with each other. Weakened geniuses' role.
評分so good
評分A rough but powerful scientific philosophy, it pulls sciences down from the superior altar, indicating sciences is delicate but still volatile outcome of human perception and mind structure/ Paradigm do matters
評分北京大學研究生必修課自然辯證法推薦讀物 補標記
評分雖然說的是科學,但是很有意思,引人入勝。
American historian and philosopher of science, a leading contributor to the change of focus in the philosophy and sociology of science in the 1960s. Thomas Samuel Kuhn was born in Cincinnati, Ohio. He received a doctorate in theoretical physics from Harvard University in 1949. But he later shifted his interest to the history and philosophy of science, which he taught at Harvard, the University of California at Berkeley, Princeton University, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
In 1962, Kuhn published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which depicted the development of the basic natural sciences in an innovative way. According to Kuhn, the sciences do not uniformly progress strictly by scientific method. Rather, there are two fundamentally different phases of scientific development in the sciences. In the first phase, scientists work within a paradigm (set of accepted beliefs). When the foundation of the paradigm weakens and new theories and scientific methods begin to replace it, the next phase of scientific discovery takes place. Kuhn believes that scientific progress—that is, progress from one paradigm to another—has no logical reasoning. Kuhn's theory has triggered widespread, controversial discussion across many scientific disciplines.
A good book may have the power to change the way we see the world, but a great book actually becomes part of our daily consciousness, pervading our thinking to the point that we take it for granted, and we forget how provocative and challenging its ideas once were—and still are. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is that kind of book. When it was first published in 1962, it was a landmark event in the history and philosophy of science. Fifty years later, it still has many lessons to teach.
With The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Kuhn challenged long-standing linear notions of scientific progress, arguing that transformative ideas don’t arise from the day-to-day, gradual process of experimentation and data accumulation but that the revolutions in science, those breakthrough moments that disrupt accepted thinking and offer unanticipated ideas, occur outside of “normal science,” as he called it. Though Kuhn was writing when physics ruled the sciences, his ideas on how scientific revolutions bring order to the anomalies that amass over time in research experiments are still instructive in our biotech age.
This new edition of Kuhn’s essential work in the history of science includes an insightful introduction by Ian Hacking, which clarifies terms popularized by Kuhn, including paradigm and incommensurability, and applies Kuhn’s ideas to the science of today. Usefully keyed to the separate sections of the book, Hacking’s introduction provides important background information as well as a contemporary context. Newly designed, with an expanded index, this edition will be eagerly welcomed by the next generation of readers seeking to understand the history of our perspectives on science.
《自然辨证法》 恩格斯 著 中共中央马、恩、列、斯著作编译局译 1971年8月1版 1971年9月1印 《科学革命的结构》 [美国] 托马斯•库恩 著 金吾伦 胡新和 译 北京大学出版社 2003年1月1版 2006年10月5印 以下引文中A表示前书,B表示后书 把这两本书放在一起比较,两位作...
評分 評分如果要举出一位最有影响力的科学哲学家,非库恩莫属。单凭「范式」这一概念在各种理论之间随处可见、遍地开花,便足以见得其大红大紫,怕是再无他人能比。的确,「范式」的提出富有创见,在科学哲学与科学史上都具有里程碑的意义,却不免有诸般疏漏;然而库恩后来几次修正,也...
評分好的方面先不说了,个人有以下四点拙见: 1. 作者在论述中有自己的态度:相对赞成科技革命,而反对保守旧式。因而在对其论述中有明显的倾向性,这点在标题里没有体现出来。标题起得大而泛。 2. 想阐述的观点没有一个明晰的纲要,比如谜、反常、危机三点之间的性质,明明是有关...
評分The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024