On Politics 在線電子書 圖書標籤: 政治 政治學 曆史 政治種種 思想史 曆史學
發表於2024-12-23
On Politics 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024
我覺得是目前最好的政治思想通史,每一個思想傢的曆史語境和主要理論觀點都呈現得很清晰。沒有薩拜因和施派文集那種不閤時宜的宏大敘事,但又不像mcdonald那樣陷入繁瑣的文本復述,隻是評論的時候有一個中肯的自由主義視角,因為比一些劍橋閤編文集有更為連貫的敘事口徑。改編自講稿,有些論述比較口語化。
評分我覺得是目前最好的政治思想通史,每一個思想傢的曆史語境和主要理論觀點都呈現得很清晰。沒有薩拜因和施派文集那種不閤時宜的宏大敘事,但又不像mcdonald那樣陷入繁瑣的文本復述,隻是評論的時候有一個中肯的自由主義視角,因為比一些劍橋閤編文集有更為連貫的敘事口徑。改編自講稿,有些論述比較口語化。
評分我覺得是目前最好的政治思想通史,每一個思想傢的曆史語境和主要理論觀點都呈現得很清晰。沒有薩拜因和施派文集那種不閤時宜的宏大敘事,但又不像mcdonald那樣陷入繁瑣的文本復述,隻是評論的時候有一個中肯的自由主義視角,因為比一些劍橋閤編文集有更為連貫的敘事口徑。改編自講稿,有些論述比較口語化。
評分我覺得是目前最好的政治思想通史,每一個思想傢的曆史語境和主要理論觀點都呈現得很清晰。沒有薩拜因和施派文集那種不閤時宜的宏大敘事,但又不像mcdonald那樣陷入繁瑣的文本復述,隻是評論的時候有一個中肯的自由主義視角,因為比一些劍橋閤編文集有更為連貫的敘事口徑。改編自講稿,有些論述比較口語化。
評分我覺得是目前最好的政治思想通史,每一個思想傢的曆史語境和主要理論觀點都呈現得很清晰。沒有薩拜因和施派文集那種不閤時宜的宏大敘事,但又不像mcdonald那樣陷入繁瑣的文本復述,隻是評論的時候有一個中肯的自由主義視角,因為比一些劍橋閤編文集有更為連貫的敘事口徑。改編自講稿,有些論述比較口語化。
阿蘭·瑞安(Alan Ryan),政治學傢、政治評論傢、英國國傢學術院院士。
他生於1940年,1988年開始任美國普林斯頓大學政治學教授,1996年至2009年間,擔任牛津大學新學院(New College, Oxford University)院長。之後,他還陸續執 教於普林斯頓大學政治學係和斯坦福大學哲學係,2015年退休。
瑞安的研究領域非常廣泛,跨越政治理論、哲學和法學,專攻自由主義政治理論,並且是斯圖爾特·穆勒、約翰·杜威思想研究方麵的權威。同時,瑞安也是一個關心公共事務的學者,針對世界的政治時事發錶過大量的講座與評論,並長期為《紐約書評》《倫敦書評》《泰晤士報文學副刊》撰寫書評和時事評論。
林華(譯者),聯閤國高級翻譯,在聯閤國總部工作30餘年,現為同聲傳譯中文組負責人。主要譯著、閤譯著包括《論中國》《世界秩序》《從黎明到衰落》《戰爭史》《地獄之行》等。
T IS hard to summon up much enthusiasm for politics these days. In Europe politicians are paralysed in the face of low growth and high unemployment. In the United States they are threatening to push the country off a fiscal cliff of their own devising. And in the Arab world spring has already turned into winter. Left-wingers rightly point out that the recently ascendant liberal orthodoxy has brought problems in its wake. Yet they are singularly incapable of forging a progressive consensus to replace it.
One of the many merits of Alan Ryan’s monumental new history of political philosophy is that it restores our enthusiasm for politics. Mr Ryan has devoted his life to studying political ideas, first at Oxford and then at Princeton, and he reminds us that politics is about fundamental philosophical issues rather than just horrible hacks calling each other poopy-heads. How can people run their collective affairs without sacrificing individual rights to collective order? What is the basis of the state’s authority over its citizens? Should that authority be absolute or limited by constitutional checks and individual rights?
The fact that human beings have been debating these subjects since the days of Plato and Aristotle matters for two obvious reasons. The first is that we continue to think about practical affairs in terms that have been bequeathed to us by our forebears. The Americans and the French are the world leaders in this, obsessed with their revolutions. But the British also think in terms of Magna Carta and colonial people in terms of their founding constitutions. Lineage matters.
It is also important that, as Mr Ryan puts it, “long-dead writers often speak to us with greater freshness and immediacy than our contemporaries.” James Madison has the best advice for Egyptian liberals who want to prevent Muhammad Morsi from turning democracy into dictatorship. John Stuart Mill (pictured centre) has the best arguments against Michael Bloomberg and the “soft despotism” entailed in his soft-drink regulations. Immanuel Kant has the best insights into the gay-marriage debate—he argues that, once you have stripped away the nonsense, marriage is nothing more than a contract for the mutual use of the sex organs. Mr Ryan’s historical approach helps us at the very least to look at our problems from new angles, and at best to harness the help of history’s sharpest minds in producing policies.
These political thinkers have the added bonus of being extraordinary characters. Thomas Hobbes (pictured right) was born prematurely during a thunderstorm—“my Mother dear, did bring forth twins, both me and fear,” he said—and erected his entire political system on the bedrock of terror. Jean-Jacques Rousseau idealised humanity but sent five children to foundling hospitals (where only 10% survived). Mill was raised to be a utilitarian calculating machine, but devoted his later years to his wife and soulmate.
Mr Ryan has packaged “On Politics” into a single volume. But it is really three books. The first is a study of political theory from Plato to Machiavelli. Mr Ryan is first-rate on Plato and Aristotle (pictured left) but workmanlike on the Middle Ages. The second takes the story from Thomas Hobbes to Karl Marx. Mr Ryan is particularly good on Hobbes, with whom he enjoys jousting, and Mill, with whom he clearly sympathises. The third book covers the great themes of political thought, such as democracy and human rights. It poses as an essay on the 20th century but in fact ranges freely over the ages. This last part is very much worth the wait.
Mr Ryan’s approach to political theory is thoroughly old-fashioned—and all the better for it. In recent years historians and political theorists have been busily undermining the Western canon—dissolving the great political theorists in their wider intellectual contexts or discovering seminal thinkers in the rest of the world. This has produced some admirable results in the skilful hands of Quentin Skinner and John Pocock, but it has also threatened to rob the great tradition of its greatness. Mr Ryan is happy to put the greatness back in. He treats Hobbes and company as thinkers to be grappled with rather than historical figures to be contextualised. He seldom strays far from the Western tradition, pointing out that the political classes around the world continue to think about politics in terms that were invented by the Greeks (who lived in city-states with populations of just a few thousand) and refined by a handful of European thinkers and their American offspring.
Mr Ryan says at one point that “the pleasures of reading Montesquieu are those of encountering a really well-stocked mind and imagination.” The same can be said of the pleasures of reading this book. Mr Ryan is not a perfect chronicler. He makes some odd editorial decisions—for example, analysing Machiavelli after the Reformation rather than before it. He commits sins of both commission and omission. He refers several times to Edward Bellamy’s Utopian novel from 1888, “Looking Backward”, but cannot find room to mention Walter Bagehot, who produced a particularly rich and interesting portrait of politics in Britain at the height of its power. He says too little about the exact ways in which Western ideas have been interpreted by the rest of the world. And he is absurdly fond of the word “plangent”. But “On Politics” is nevertheless an impressive achievement: an enjoyable mental workout and an admirable monument to a lifetime of academic toil.
这是一本精装书,无论排版还是印刷都十分精致,内容成熟、官方,非常适合收藏与阅读。看得出来这本书在制作上面很用心,作者完成一本无论是字数还是内容都如此厚重的书,相比也是花了很多的精力,这本书值得被尊重。这边书中所汇集的内容很全面,对于政治历史的记载也很属实,...
評分其实是一般历史书,徐徐的展开了西方政治体系的发展,其中各种史实故事读起来津津有味。后半部基本上就是基督教成立之后在西方世界的发展史,西方政治文化中,基督教信仰是不可缺少的重要一环。其实是一般历史书,徐徐的展开了西方政治体系的发展,其中各种史实故事读起来津津...
評分On Politics 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024