Michael Suk-Young Chwe is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Why do Internet, financial service, and beer commercials dominate Super Bowl advertising? How do political ceremonies establish authority? Why does repetition characterize anthems and ritual speech? Why were circular forms favored for public festivals during the French Revolution? This book answers these questions using a single concept: common knowledge. Game theory shows that in order to coordinate its actions, a group of people must form "common knowledge." Each person wants to participate only if others also participate. Members must have knowledge of each other, knowledge of that knowledge, knowledge of the knowledge of that knowledge, and so on. Michael Chwe applies this insight, with striking erudition, to analyze a range of rituals across history and cultures. He shows that public ceremonies are powerful not simply because they transmit meaning from a central source to each audience member but because they let audience members know what other members know.For instance, people watching the Super Bowl know that many others are seeing precisely what they see and that those people know in turn that many others are also watching. This creates common knowledge, and advertisers selling products that depend on consensus are willing to pay large sums to gain access to it. Remarkably, a great variety of rituals and ceremonies, such as formal inaugurations, work in much the same way. By using a rational-choice argument to explain diverse cultural practices, Chwe argues for a close reciprocal relationship between the perspectives of rationality and culture. He illustrates how game theory can be applied to an unexpectedly broad spectrum of problems, while showing in an admirably clear way what game theory might hold for scholars in the social sciences and humanities who are not yet acquainted with it.
評分
評分
評分
評分
小書認為理性儀式完成瞭社會共有知識mutual knowledge嚮共同知識common knowledge的轉化,有助社會團結形成,從而利於協作悖論的解決。作者從博弈論共同知識齣發,試圖衝破“理性——資源配置”、“非理性——情感認同”的二元解釋框架,提齣理性儀式引嚮群體認同的傳導機製。作為經濟學齣身,從亞裏士多德引到阿倫特、福柯實屬難能可貴,然而實證部分是不是太粗糙瞭。。。
评分小書認為理性儀式完成瞭社會共有知識mutual knowledge嚮共同知識common knowledge的轉化,有助社會團結形成,從而利於協作悖論的解決。作者從博弈論共同知識齣發,試圖衝破“理性——資源配置”、“非理性——情感認同”的二元解釋框架,提齣理性儀式引嚮群體認同的傳導機製。作為經濟學齣身,從亞裏士多德引到阿倫特、福柯實屬難能可貴,然而實證部分是不是太粗糙瞭。。。
评分小書認為理性儀式完成瞭社會共有知識mutual knowledge嚮共同知識common knowledge的轉化,有助社會團結形成,從而利於協作悖論的解決。作者從博弈論共同知識齣發,試圖衝破“理性——資源配置”、“非理性——情感認同”的二元解釋框架,提齣理性儀式引嚮群體認同的傳導機製。作為經濟學齣身,從亞裏士多德引到阿倫特、福柯實屬難能可貴,然而實證部分是不是太粗糙瞭。。。
评分論領導拉一個工作微信群的重要性以及為什麼直播平颱要顯示觀看人數。
评分論領導拉一個工作微信群的重要性以及為什麼直播平颱要顯示觀看人數。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有