James C. Scott is the Eugene Meyer Professor of Political Science and Anthropology at Yale University and current president of the Association of Asian Studies. He is the author of Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, and The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia, all published by Yale University Press.
Compulsory ujamaa villages in Tanzania, collectivization in Russia, Le Corbusier's urban planning theory realized in Brasilia, the Great Leap Forward in China, agricultural "modernization" in the Tropics -- the twentieth century has been racked by grand utopian schemes that have inadvertently brought death and disruption to millions. Why do well-intentioned plans for improving the human condition go tragically awry? In this wide-ranging and original book, James C. Scott analyzes failed cases of large-scale authoritarian plans in a variety of fields. Centrally managed social plans misfire, Scott argues, when they impose schematic visions that do violence to complex interdependencies that are not -- and cannot -- be fully understood. Further, the success of designs for social organization depends upon the recognition that local, practical knowledge is as important as formal, epistemic knowledge. The author builds a persuasive case against "development theory" and imperialistic state planning that disregards the values, desires, and objections of its subjects. He identifies and discusses four conditions common to all planning disasters: administrative ordering of nature and society by the state; a "high-modernist ideology" that places confidence in the ability of science to improve every aspect of human life; a willingness to use authoritarian state power to effect large-scale interventions; and a prostrate civil society that cannot effectively resist such plans. "A broad-ranging, theoretically important, and empirically grounded treatment of the modern state and its propensity to simplify and make legible a society which by nature is complex and opaque. For anyone interested inlearning about this fundamental tension of modernity and about the destruction wrought in the twentieth century as a consequence of the dominant development ideology of the simplifying state, this is a must-read". -- Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, author of Hitler's Willing Executioners
先从从林业、赋税、土地制度、度量衡、姓氏、城市规划、革命、集体农业的具体案例谈大型规划中的极端现代主义,然后回到认识论谈地方性知识/实践知识。 如书名所说,确实是“国家的视角”,主要从剖析规划者为什么以及如何执迷于清晰化和规整化,但Scott其实也有讲不少来自“规...
评分读斯科特《国家的视角》一书,特别是将这本书翻译出来以后,觉得有很多话想说,但是犹豫了很久,因为一直没有理清思路,怕话说不清楚,也就一直没有说。其实最开始吸引我的是这本书的副标题《那些试图改善人类状况的项目是如何失败的》,因为这个副标题至少在两个方面引起了我...
评分“我在头脑里建造一座样板城市,可以按照她来演变出所有可能的城市来,”忽必烈说,“她包含一切符合常规的东西。鉴于现有的城市都或多或少偏离常规,我就只须预先料想到常规的种种例外,便能计算出它们最可能的组合形式来。” ...
评分“我在头脑里建造一座样板城市,可以按照她来演变出所有可能的城市来,”忽必烈说,“她包含一切符合常规的东西。鉴于现有的城市都或多或少偏离常规,我就只须预先料想到常规的种种例外,便能计算出它们最可能的组合形式来。” ...
评分先从从林业、赋税、土地制度、度量衡、姓氏、城市规划、革命、集体农业的具体案例谈大型规划中的极端现代主义,然后回到认识论谈地方性知识/实践知识。 如书名所说,确实是“国家的视角”,主要从剖析规划者为什么以及如何执迷于清晰化和规整化,但Scott其实也有讲不少来自“规...
对国家理性尤其是国家计划的批判,这是长处,缺点是没有区分不同的理性,难道政府就不用发挥任何作用了莫?
评分哎 太长了 赶什么一样终于大概撸了一遍。。。总得来说 逻辑简单粗暴又随意 方法论有点问题 瞄到豆瓣简评我就震惊了。。。 究竟我们读的是同一本么!anarchist你个头啦 人家哪里anarchist了。。。
评分三星半。略失望。主要论点拎出来之后,基本上就没有亮点了。
评分三星半。略失望。主要论点拎出来之后,基本上就没有亮点了。
评分城市规划和苏联集体化两章很精彩,最后对metis的强调不仅话痨,而且跑题。因为政治权力推行的high modernism是多种不同的意识形态,既未必涉及知识,也未必是为了改善人类状况。这不是认识论缺陷导致的失察,而是政治斗争的结果。(全书莫名话痨,可能为了强化一种metis吧。)
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有