A PhD Is Not Enough pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

☆☆☆☆☆

P. J. 费贝尔曼固体物理学家。1967年获加州大学圣迭戈分校物理博士学位。先后在法国萨克莱国家原子核研究中心和美国伊利诺大学厄尔巴那分校做博士后研究。其后有三年时间，在美国纽约州立大学石溪分校任物理学助理教授。1974年后在桑地亚国家实验室，成为技术部门的杰出成员。1989年荣获美国物理学会为表面科学的杰出研究人员设立的戴维逊-革末尔奖。

出版者:Basic Books

作者:Peter J. Feibelman

出品人:

页数:128

译者:

出版时间:1993-12-21

价格:USD 16.50

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780201626636

丛书系列:

图书标签:

科研
PHD
学习
人生
academic
科学
Research
教育

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到图书目录大全

book.wenda123.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

Despite your graduate education, brainpower, and technical prowess, your career in scientific research is far from assured. Permanent positions are scarce, science survival is rarely part of formal graduate training, and a good mentor is hard to find. This exceptional volume explains what stands between you and fulfilling long-term research career. Bringing the key survival skills into focus, A Ph.D. Is Not Enough! proposes a rational approach to establishing yourself as a scientist. It offers sound advice of selecting a thesis or postdoctoral adviser, choosing among research jobs in academia, government laboratories, and industry, preparing for an employment interview, and defining a research program. This book will help you make your oral presentations effective, your journal articles compelling, and your grant proposals successful. A Ph.D. Is Not Enough should be required reading for anyone on the threshold of a career in science.

具体描述

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

书中很不客气地批判了那种对于科研的理想主义思潮，作者以一个过来人的的口吻，指点那些有志于学术生涯的后生，要想在学术界立足，必须要做一些「常规工作」，比如定期汇总工作形成论文，与同事积极沟通互相帮助，做一次漂亮的报告，花心思修饰一份申请……看上去就像一份求职...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

This is a book teaches you how to deal with your academic life other than Professional skills. I recommended this book to all my friends who were still in the academic community, and they fell in love with this book immediately. I personally learnt a lot ...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

说来惭愧，这本书在我读博士期间就已经接触到了，但一直躺在我的文件夹中，没有被打开过。直到昨天买到这本书，发现原来这么薄，上午不到一个小时就看完了，内容没有多少，但其中提到的几个观点倒是很有启发。（一）问题导向VS技术导向作者在两个地方提到了这两种思维模式。...

评分☆☆☆☆☆