Craig Clunas is Senior Lecturer in the History of Art at the University of Sussex. He has published extensively on the culture of the Ming period. His books include Fruitful Sites: Garden Culture in Ming Dynasty China; Art in China; and Superfluous Things: Material Culture and Social Status in Early Modern China.
Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China is not simply a survey of sixteenth-century images, but rather, a thorough and thoughtful examination of visual culture in China's Ming Dynasty, one that considers images wherever they appeared—not only paintings, but also illustrated books, maps, ceramic bowls, lacquered boxes, painted fans, and even clothing and tomb pictures.
Clunas's theory of visuality incorporates not only the image and the object upon which it is placed but also the culture which produced and purchased it. Economic changes in sixteenth-century China—the rapid expansion of trade routes and a growing class of consumers—are thus intricately bound up with the evolution of the image itself. Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China will be a touchstone for students of Chinese history, art, and culture.
艺术是否定社会性的主要场域之一 ——(法)布迪厄 本来买读此书的目的是为了了解中国物质文明所承载的美学意韵,想要的美学意韵没有找到,却意外发现了元朝解除的政治家与文人画大师赵孟頫也是“春宫画”巨匠,可以说中国的...
评分翻了下北大版,立马被其中插图吸引。好东西都在国外,看多了自然就能写了,不需要深奥,但印象深刻,这就是得一手资源的无敌优势,也是国外sinology更强于我们的原因。看看这个被掏空了的“中国“,剩下的只有不能写的现实题材可写。翻了下北大版,立马被其中插图吸引。好东西...
评分纯美术史,绘画史看多了,有时免不了障目。Craig Clunas通过图像学的角度来阐释明朝艺术之大环境,且不说史料的丰富,单就这个角度也是让后来做艺术史的人有所启发。Richard Vinogard 在“stones from Other Mountains: Chinese Painting Studies in Postwar America"一文中就...
评分艺术是否定社会性的主要场域之一 ——(法)布迪厄 本来买读此书的目的是为了了解中国物质文明所承载的美学意韵,想要的美学意韵没有找到,却意外发现了元朝解除的政治家与文人画大师赵孟頫也是“春宫画”巨匠,可以说中国的...
评分This book address some basic questions about Chinese visual arts. A basic proposition is that from 1400-1700 there was a transition in painting and other visual arts from referential to self-referential, e.g. from mimesis to symbolic. This book defies sim...
写得有趣的一本书。像明代印刷时代下书籍的普及与宗教等公共建筑壁画之间的竞争,就是一种很好理解却又很难理清楚但被作者大致上理个清楚的一章。下文,对于《三才图会》中“天、地、人”三大主题的表现方式的讨论,对理解明代人的视觉文化,很有启发:“天”的表达,反而越来越不具像了,地的表达则跟时代的商品化、地图、收藏品的制作有关。。。。第5章讨论的是“木版印刷时代的艺术”,外加一章专讲情色画。
评分讲三才图会那一节,尤其是“地”那一节和上学期写早期中国地图的东西都串上了,感觉很高兴。全书结论里面关于图(picture)与画(painting)的complementary bipolarity(这词是引用浦安迪的说法)关系很有启发。
评分由此书起,柯律格不再立足于某一个特定的材料或者特定的艺术家来看明代,而是撒下一张巨大的网,经纬纵横穿插于多种媒材,多个阶层,多种观看模式和多种话语之间。如此之野心需要一个精心设计的结构或者是坚实的理论,甚至是一种信念在背后作为支持。由一种后见之明看来,这种对明代的复杂性的看法是显而易见的,一种fine art的确立必然是一种垄断性话语和实践的构建的产物,而由此,艺术史则进入了视觉文化和物质文化研究的范畴,研究的重心也从图像和审美要素进入社会学和人类学。
评分读了第四章,和Prof讨论的时候感觉还是有些问题的
评分不太记得了,印象就读了关于“观”和“读”概念的两章很有趣
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有