Craig Clunas is Senior Lecturer in the History of Art at the University of Sussex. He has published extensively on the culture of the Ming period. His books include Fruitful Sites: Garden Culture in Ming Dynasty China; Art in China; and Superfluous Things: Material Culture and Social Status in Early Modern China.
Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China is not simply a survey of sixteenth-century images, but rather, a thorough and thoughtful examination of visual culture in China's Ming Dynasty, one that considers images wherever they appeared—not only paintings, but also illustrated books, maps, ceramic bowls, lacquered boxes, painted fans, and even clothing and tomb pictures.
Clunas's theory of visuality incorporates not only the image and the object upon which it is placed but also the culture which produced and purchased it. Economic changes in sixteenth-century China—the rapid expansion of trade routes and a growing class of consumers—are thus intricately bound up with the evolution of the image itself. Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China will be a touchstone for students of Chinese history, art, and culture.
《早期现代中国的图像与视觉性》(Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China,下文简称《视觉性》)一书虽早自1997年便问世,不过新近中文译本之出版却丝毫无减其引领中国近世视觉文化研究的先锋理念。于柯律格(Craig Clunas)而言,这本章节内容看似纷杂、内里却一脉相...
評分《早期现代中国的图像与视觉性》(Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China,下文简称《视觉性》)一书虽早自1997年便问世,不过新近中文译本之出版却丝毫无减其引领中国近世视觉文化研究的先锋理念。于柯律格(Craig Clunas)而言,这本章节内容看似纷杂、内里却一脉相...
評分Craig《明代的图像与视觉性》预设的读者并非我们这样的中国人,而是那些在70-80年代对于中国艺术并不了解或者西方中心主义的艺术史家。我并不清楚类似的偏见有多大,但是当时中国美术史研究的重镇因为Cahill而在美国,并不在英国。所以了解了这个背景,我也就能容忍本书的第四...
評分纯美术史,绘画史看多了,有时免不了障目。Craig Clunas通过图像学的角度来阐释明朝艺术之大环境,且不说史料的丰富,单就这个角度也是让后来做艺术史的人有所启发。Richard Vinogard 在“stones from Other Mountains: Chinese Painting Studies in Postwar America"一文中就...
評分This book address some basic questions about Chinese visual arts. A basic proposition is that from 1400-1700 there was a transition in painting and other visual arts from referential to self-referential, e.g. from mimesis to symbolic. This book defies sim...
wow!很期待
评分print culture那一章用本雅明的理論有些見地
评分不太記得瞭,印象就讀瞭關於“觀”和“讀”概念的兩章很有趣
评分由此書起,柯律格不再立足於某一個特定的材料或者特定的藝術傢來看明代,而是撒下一張巨大的網,經緯縱橫穿插於多種媒材,多個階層,多種觀看模式和多種話語之間。如此之野心需要一個精心設計的結構或者是堅實的理論,甚至是一種信念在背後作為支持。由一種後見之明看來,這種對明代的復雜性的看法是顯而易見的,一種fine art的確立必然是一種壟斷性話語和實踐的構建的産物,而由此,藝術史則進入瞭視覺文化和物質文化研究的範疇,研究的重心也從圖像和審美要素進入社會學和人類學。
评分第五章,感受不到作者精密的論述,關於《顧氏畫譜》的圖繪,一方麵沒有瞭印章和題款導緻瞭失去瞭本雅明意義上的historical testimony,另一方麵這本身確實是想象性作品的再復製,然後便對西方之於現代性的理論提齣一個具有東方性的質疑,其實這其中的好多層次都沒有說清楚的,隻是蜻蜓點水,倍感迷惑。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有