Craig Clunas is Senior Lecturer in the History of Art at the University of Sussex. He has published extensively on the culture of the Ming period. His books include Fruitful Sites: Garden Culture in Ming Dynasty China; Art in China; and Superfluous Things: Material Culture and Social Status in Early Modern China.
Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China is not simply a survey of sixteenth-century images, but rather, a thorough and thoughtful examination of visual culture in China's Ming Dynasty, one that considers images wherever they appeared—not only paintings, but also illustrated books, maps, ceramic bowls, lacquered boxes, painted fans, and even clothing and tomb pictures.
Clunas's theory of visuality incorporates not only the image and the object upon which it is placed but also the culture which produced and purchased it. Economic changes in sixteenth-century China—the rapid expansion of trade routes and a growing class of consumers—are thus intricately bound up with the evolution of the image itself. Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China will be a touchstone for students of Chinese history, art, and culture.
艺术是否定社会性的主要场域之一 ——(法)布迪厄 本来买读此书的目的是为了了解中国物质文明所承载的美学意韵,想要的美学意韵没有找到,却意外发现了元朝解除的政治家与文人画大师赵孟頫也是“春宫画”巨匠,可以说中国的...
評分艺术是否定社会性的主要场域之一 ——(法)布迪厄 本来买读此书的目的是为了了解中国物质文明所承载的美学意韵,想要的美学意韵没有找到,却意外发现了元朝解除的政治家与文人画大师赵孟頫也是“春宫画”巨匠,可以说中国的...
評分谈起明朝历史,总能引起后人的满腹狐疑。张岱在《石匮书序》里如是讽刺明史——“有明一代,国史失诬,家史失谀,野史失臆,故以二百八十二年总成一个诬妄世界。”既然正史不可靠,于是,研究者自然就要另辟蹊径,纷纷跑去《金瓶梅》和“三言二拍”里挖掘明代的饮食、服饰等文...
評分翻了下北大版,立马被其中插图吸引。好东西都在国外,看多了自然就能写了,不需要深奥,但印象深刻,这就是得一手资源的无敌优势,也是国外sinology更强于我们的原因。看看这个被掏空了的“中国“,剩下的只有不能写的现实题材可写。翻了下北大版,立马被其中插图吸引。好东西...
評分This book address some basic questions about Chinese visual arts. A basic proposition is that from 1400-1700 there was a transition in painting and other visual arts from referential to self-referential, e.g. from mimesis to symbolic. This book defies sim...
第四章對於幾個很重要卻被忽略的關鍵詞的來源進行瞭很精到的對比分析,“圖”、“畫”、“讀”、“看”、“觀”、“賞”。。
评分第五章,感受不到作者精密的論述,關於《顧氏畫譜》的圖繪,一方麵沒有瞭印章和題款導緻瞭失去瞭本雅明意義上的historical testimony,另一方麵這本身確實是想象性作品的再復製,然後便對西方之於現代性的理論提齣一個具有東方性的質疑,其實這其中的好多層次都沒有說清楚的,隻是蜻蜓點水,倍感迷惑。
评分讀瞭第四章,和Prof討論的時候感覺還是有些問題的
评分wow!很期待
评分wow!很期待
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有