Kevin J. O’Brien is Bedford Professor of Political Science at the University
of California, Berkeley. His research focuses on popular p rotest and Chinese
politics in the reform era. He is the author of Reform without Liberalization:
China’s National People’s Congress and the Politics of Institutional Change and the coeditor of Engaging the Law in China: State, Society, and Possibilities for Justice. Currently, he is serving as the chair of the Center for Chinese Studies at UCBerkeley.
Lianjiang Li is an associate professor in the Department of Government and
International Studies at Hong Kong Baptist University. His research focuses
on village elections and collective action in rural China. He has published in
Asian Survey, China Information, China Journal, China Quarterly, Comparative
Politics, Comparative Political Studies, Journal of Contemporary China, and Modern China.
How can the poor and weak “work”a political system to their advantage?
Drawing mainly on interviews and surveys in rural China, Kevin O’Brien and
Lianjiang Li show that popular action often hinges on locating and exploiting
divisions within the state. Otherwise powerless people use the rhetoric and
commitments of the central government to try to fight misconduct by local
officials, open up clogged channels of participation, and push back the frontiers of the permissible. This “rightful resistance” has far-reaching implications for our understanding of contentious politics. As O’Brien and Li explore the origins, dynamics, and consequences of rightful resistance, they highlight similarities between collective action in places as varied as China, the former East Germany, and the United States, while suggesting how Chinese experiences speak to issues such as opportunities to protest, claims radicalization, tactical innovation, and the outcomes of contention. Although the focus of their rich, ground-level analysis is contemporary China, the authors make a compelling argument that wherever a gap between rights promised and rights delivered exists, there is room for rightful resistance to emerge.
吃好晚饭以后开始发奋读书。看掉了Rightful Resistance in Rural China,这是我读到过的近两年来写当代中国写得最好的一本书。当然,我好象一共也没读过几本……我很推荐这本书,无论是对于社会运动理论有兴趣,还是对于当今中国政治转型有关照,或者仅仅是想知道中国农村现在...
评分吃好晚饭以后开始发奋读书。看掉了Rightful Resistance in Rural China,这是我读到过的近两年来写当代中国写得最好的一本书。当然,我好象一共也没读过几本……我很推荐这本书,无论是对于社会运动理论有兴趣,还是对于当今中国政治转型有关照,或者仅仅是想知道中国农村现在...
评分吃好晚饭以后开始发奋读书。看掉了Rightful Resistance in Rural China,这是我读到过的近两年来写当代中国写得最好的一本书。当然,我好象一共也没读过几本……我很推荐这本书,无论是对于社会运动理论有兴趣,还是对于当今中国政治转型有关照,或者仅仅是想知道中国农村现在...
评分吃好晚饭以后开始发奋读书。看掉了Rightful Resistance in Rural China,这是我读到过的近两年来写当代中国写得最好的一本书。当然,我好象一共也没读过几本……我很推荐这本书,无论是对于社会运动理论有兴趣,还是对于当今中国政治转型有关照,或者仅仅是想知道中国农村现在...
评分吃好晚饭以后开始发奋读书。看掉了Rightful Resistance in Rural China,这是我读到过的近两年来写当代中国写得最好的一本书。当然,我好象一共也没读过几本……我很推荐这本书,无论是对于社会运动理论有兴趣,还是对于当今中国政治转型有关照,或者仅仅是想知道中国农村现在...
道理似乎并不复杂。无权的老百姓,利用央地关系的罅隙或者话语-实践的落差,以子之矛,攻子之盾。用词比较“讲究”,但我觉得少用点高级单词似乎也不会耽误说理。。
评分as long as “the bird of rule by law” has remained in the “cage of the party-state”, the Chinese rightful resistances are not necessarily successful.
评分这本书非常好。每章提出问题的方式比较有启发,对于rightful resistance的文献梳理比较全面。对于政府的分析大多集中在政府是layered,不是铁板一块,虽然这些在政府课上都学过,但是对于思考社会运动中的社会国家关系比较有启发。
评分只粗略的看了一下大概,重点看了第一章。因为不是做这个领域的,在中国目前似乎也不大有做这个领域的空间。但这是一本经典书,值得读,尤其是对写作有很好的借鉴,研究下作者是如何提出一个新概念,并与原有概念进行比较,并将之作为普世的可以被其他现象使用的概念。
评分这样用材料总会让人读起来有些不快,毕竟很不鲜活,不过批评似乎有些武断了。那么多关键的文献,作研究的索引参考也很好。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有